-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
-
-
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
I heard one analyst say that Parsons is (or was relative to the same age) a better player than Mack. Could be recency bias, but I'd say that that's absolutely true. -
Watson is a cautionary tale because he pulled that trade coming off a full year he didn’t play due to injury and then almost a whole other full season due to an 11 game suspension for being a creep. If Parsons was coming off all of that, I’d agree - we don’t do it. But Parsons has been mentioned with the likes of LT and Mack. If we could swing it, we should do it. I don’t think the cowboys would trade him in-conference, but we’ve seen wilder things happen before (McRib to WSH). -
Saw a post somewhere earlier that said what the Bears gave up for Khalil Mack would be a fair comp as to what to expect it would take to get Parsons. But Parsons is actually a year younger than Mack was at that point, and also, I believe Mack was named an all-pro at two different positions that prior year, iirc… but I think Parsons is as equally versatile. we should definitely see what it would cost, at minimum.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.