Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why did it take an injury for Norwell to play?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

where offense is concerned i don't trust rivera. i don't trust gettleman with the OL.

i think both guys are obsessed with the DL which is why 3 of the past 4 first and second round picks have been DL and we decided to invest 20% of the cap on two players from the same position and moved the least talented DT to the OL to be a starting OT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we brought Mike Wahle in, in 2005, we had a pretty revamped Oline that season as well. thing is, they had more talent as well. Wahle stated how much work it was to get the Oline to gel. To get used to the foot placement of the person next to you. to get their tendencies down and really start to work as one solid unit.This was in a preseason interview.

Personally, I think the fact that there wasn't a "decided" position for Bell or Chandler early in training camp has hindered the Oline in that process Wahle was talking about. Since then, injuries have been an issue as well. So there's not much in the "One Solid Unit" when the time together keeps getting changed up.

We all knew it'd take time to get the line to be a unit. But, talent level lacking, and cohesion lacking as well, I hope that the team sets positions and early and lets the line work together in the right positions. Instead of having players learn new positions all Mini camp, and early training camp ad when the first game comes up, only then make a decision on who's gonna play where.

amen.

starters should have been decided on in mini camp and more should have been done to ensure that we at least had competition. then the rest of the offseason spent creating chemistry and cohesion. this is something that we need to do, but have failed miserably at going back years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unlikely unless Rivera asks, which I'd question.

Two things pretty much every NFL head coach is given full control over: Their staff and the depth chart.

GMs - Gettleman included - have no more say on these things than they do when time outs are called on game day.

It would be interesting to know how the DG/RR dynamic really works. I am sure there is more disagreement and compromise that goes on then what we are privy to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...