Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I met MJ last Saturday


Cary Kollins

Recommended Posts

Damn that's awesome.

 

I bet if he signed a Duke hat it would be his most rare autograph.

 

 

Later on that day we bought a Wachovia Championship pin flag from the souvenir shop to get some autographs. My son got about 20 or so which included Peyton Manning and Tiger Woods. I really wish we had that flag when MJ hit that ball in the woods. To have one flag signed by the greats of their game like Peyton, Tiger, and MJ would have been priceless. Instead we settled for Peyton Manning, Tiger and Jimmie Johnson (NASCAR) which just isn't quite the same.  :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jordan > LeBron and its not even close

lebron is a better all around player, jordan by far the better scorer. Sure LeBron isn't the icon that pretty much helped build the biggest sports brand (nike) from the start. Jordan is a great player but people talk like the man never missed a shot in his life because Nike, the media and folklore immortalizes him.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No point to this other than the title. As someone that for as long as I can remember has had a passion for watching and playing basketball this was huge for me, just to shake his hand and share a few words.

Pics or it oh wait

attachicon.gifImageUploadedByCarolinaHuddle1414438766.961503.jpg

Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

 

Was it you who attended this event last year and posted about it?  For some reason I remember that Cody Zeller was in that thread as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...