Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best free agent acquisition by Gettleman this offseason? Vote now!


Sam Mills Fan

Best Gettleman FA acquisition this offseason?  

61 members have voted

  1. 1. Best Gettleman FA acquisition this offseason?

    • Roman Harper
      6
    • Jason Avant
      5
    • Antoine Cason
      5
    • Jerricho Cotchery
      18
    • Thomas DeCoud
      6
    • Tiquan Underwood
      3
    • Ed Dickson
      2
    • Joe Webb
      13
    • Mike McNeill
      3


Recommended Posts

Roman Harper

Thomas DeCoud

Antoine Cason

Jason Avant

Tiquan Underwood

Jerricho Cotchery

Mike McNeill

Ed Dickson

Joe Webb

Lots of great ones there to choose from, who do you think was the best?

I don't normally agree with your posts but that list is horrid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is none of these above not a choice?

 

What do you mean? Are you implying that this isn't a great list of free agent studs? We have our Messiah Dave Gettleman just unleashing Gettlemagic out there 24/7 bringing us Pro Bowler after Pro Bowler, you would dare say these guys aren't good?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you mean? Are you implying that this isn't a great list of free agent studs? We have our Messiah Dave Gettleman just unleashing Gettlemagic out there 24/7 bringing us Pro Bowler after Pro Bowler, you would dare say these guys aren't good?

There are just to many good players I can't bring myself to just pick 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uh yeah stud highly sought after free agents don't sign for anywhere near what any of these guys got

 

avant, cotchery and decoud have been reasonably decent for the next to nothing contracts we could afford to give them. i wouldn't mind keeping them moving forward

 

cason and harper have both been terrible and should be cut this offseason. the rest of the guys are bottom of the roster types who were never really expected to contribute much anyway

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...