Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fans gloom and doom after one preseason game still amazes me.


Highlandfire

Recommended Posts

It is preseason folks, thats all. We are not going to show anything that we will be doing in the regular season esp to a team like the Giants.

You want to get out of preseason healthy, get some work for the vets as a warm up and then see what depth you have. That's it.

As for as the Giants game, we went with the same front, same coverages the whole game. No shifting, no stunts, no blitzes, no dropping the Mike backer deep like we might do on passing downs...nothing. Just plain vanilla. Our DL pretty much lined up 5, 1, 3, 5 the whole night. NYG on the other hand seemed to run everything they could on offense at us and we still didn't exactly suck. On offense, we went blah as hell and still ran the ball well.

Guys I am not upset with the performance at all, it is game one of preseason thats all. Now do we still need some help at DT? Sure, but I am still not alarmed too much yet. Still 3 games to go and about 4 weeks before we kick off for real.

Relax :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with some of what has been said except for a few things...

1) Nobody cares about the wins and losses so stop the comparisons with the Lions being 4-0 last year or how the Observer ran a story about when the panthers were 2-2 in two of the years we went to the playoffs. The wins and losses are a non issue and it irritates me that people keep using that as an arguement to preseason's unimportance.

2) Yeah we were vanilla but believe me they were too. They didn't gameplan any more than we did, and they ran some pretty basic stuff at us, Coughlin is much smarter than that.

3) I think people are most upset with the run defense and how the offense just didn't seem to click. I watched all the preseason games prior to this and to be honest there were much sharper teams in their first preseason game than we were, but also some that were much worse.

With all that said I agree that the doom and gloom is pretty ridiculous. People who are angry at Gamble for that missed tackle are crazy and Godfrey missed a few tackles but its early and he is better in coverage anyway. Jarrett really never got a chance since Jake was out of synch and the special teams always gives up a big return or two in the preseason. Then there is the other side of the coversation, Jeremy Leman looked good and may make the roster but he isn't the savior at linebacker. I even heard people praising Beavers and Monk who each had one catch.

What we should take away from this game is that we had no injuries, the 1st team offense ran the ball well, Nick Hayden is a chump, and the backups played hard, we have a long way to go before the beginning of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In fairness, I was already in doom and gloom mode before training camp.

But really, from the fans who are eternally optimistic, can you legitimately tell me that we are a BETTER team than last year? Did we actually improve in the offseason? If nothing else, based on personnel alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most panther fans will be all doom and gloom after any loss, I've come to accept it. As long as they have Delhomme to blame doom and gloom will always be here.

Exactly. Most fairweather fans know nothing about the team and are content to bash Jake, as if he's the only player on the team.

After McCown through the interception of a tipped pass the other night, my friend texted me "Classic Delhomme." Then a minute later he wrote, "My bad, only half watching."

All of my friends who call themselves "Panthers fans" are like this. Everything that goes wrong on the team is due to Jake, and any nice play Jake makes is due to Smith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...