Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dave Gettleman's Head Coaches


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Right name, wrong spelling.  It's Frank Reich, currently the offensive coordinator in San Diego.  He's currently getting some buzz as a head coaching candidate.

 

Reich could also bring with him another old Bill that Gettleman would be familiar with in TE Coach Pete Metzelaars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All valid points. Im not sitting here saying dave will do this, this, and this or that he has been awesome. Im pretty much just saying im excited to see how he will put this team together going forward and what it will look like when hurneys finger prints are gone. Sure im optimistic but its more just curiosity of what kind of different team we are looking at.

And i now think gettleman wasnt trying to piece together this team for a run this year. I think hes got the fututre 100% in mind.

Honestly I'm not sure that was the plan this season. I have yet to see any players except in the draft as long term. I think his plan just like last year is to weather the storm while drafting well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And one other name that could become an option under the 'friend of a friend' category...

 

Saints OC Pete Carmichael actually has two coaching connections to Dave Gettleman, one direct, one 'shirt tail'.

 

Current Saints Head Coach Sean Payton was with the Giants as QB Coach and OC from 1999-2002.  Carmichael was added to his staff the year Payton took over the Saints (2006) as their QB Coach.  He has since worked his way up to offensive coordinator.

 

The other connection, though perhaps more relevant, is also indirect.

 

If you look up the Jaguars coaching staff, you'll find that from 1994 to 1999 their WR coach listed as Pete Carmichael.  The Jags head coach at the time?  Tom Coughlin.

 

Dig a little further and you'll find that during both of Coughlin's stints as a coach at Boston College, Pete Carmichael was part of the staff.  Coughlin was BC's QB coach from 81 to 83, during which time Carmichael coached DBs.  When Coughlin later took over as the head coach from 91 to 93, Carmichael was coaching the receivers.  When Coughlin got the Jacksonville job, he took Carmichael with him.

 

The trick here though is that the coach who works for Payton is Pete Carmichael Jr.  The one employed by Coughlin was Pete Carmichael Sr.  And yes, they're father and son.

 

So would those connections get him a job?

 

Unknown, but I suspect they could at least get him an interview.

 

Mind you, it wouldn't be Carmichael's first head coaching interview,  The Bears, Lions and Jaguars have all reportedly reached out to him in years past.  The question - as it is with all assistants to coaching 'geniuses' - how much is really him and how much is actually his boss?

 

Guess that's what you'd have to figure out in the vetting process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically, if you go by the old theory that who you know i more important than what, we could be looking at Gary Kubiak, Kyle Shanahan and maybe Frank Reich as part of our 'short list'.

Kyle Shanahan would be the best coach to develop Cam from that particular list,imo.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know that yet in reality.

Him being hired and told you have to straighten out x, y, and z is a job assignment. Not loving all Hurney guys doesn't mean he won't overly show love to his guys once they get established.

This was his first real offseason. You could easily argue what hurt us most was the front offices decision to "over invest " at one postion (DE) at a clear detriment to the rest of the team. Being against the Hardy tag can be viewed for the same reasons as being against signing 2 guys to featured RB money

He gave no long term money to hardy. 13 million is for one year.

Saying he could have invested in oline, special teams isn't entirely accurate. Maybe if he could have given one year contracts to those guys maybe. But all in all it would have been more than the 13 million to garner the talent that hardy would have been.

And Kenjon barner. I know that's a sixth round pick but....

Last year was such a complete and total success in almost all signings it set such an incredible expectation. There is only so much talent to go around in an offseason at a dumpster diving price.

One mistake I would say he made was not signing obviously athletic, hungry talent that was not I. The right system to succeed. A la ginn, Mitchell. And then we had an opportunity to sign a talent like mikell who was a top five safety statistically. Options like that weren't really available this offseason.

Say we signed Collins who went to tampa that was 15 million guaranteed compared to 13. And hardy is obviously the more talented player. So would you rather have that 5 mill a year for 5 with 15 gauranteed for a tackle that sucks balls (and was basically the cheapest or most reasonable option) or an elite talent that could mask an entire position groups deficiencies?

This season was lost because of hardys poo, cams surgery/injuries and Ron reverting back to his former self for the most part

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im tired of ppl saying he could have spent that 13 million in other areas of drastic need when signing that type of talent would cost more than the 14 million guaranteed and future dead money once subpar talent on the market would have eventually been cut. Hardy was the gamble to keep this team competitive for one more transition year and give us back to back winning seasons.

Hardy is one of the most talented players in the league who still hadn't hit his ceiling and he fuged us majorly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He gave no long term money to hardy. 13 million is for one year.

Saying he could have invested in oline, special teams isn't entirely accurate. Maybe if he could have given one year contracts to those guys maybe. But all in all it would have been more than the 13 million to garner the talent that hardy would have been.

And Kenjon barner. I know that's a sixth round pick but....

Last year was such a complete and total success in almost all signings it set such an incredible expectation. There is only so much talent to go around in an offseason at a dumpster diving price.

One mistake I would say he made was not signing obviously athletic, hungry talent that was not I. The right system to succeed. A la ginn, Mitchell. And then we had an opportunity to sign a talent like mikell who was a top five safety statistically. Options like that weren't really available this offseason.

Say we signed Collins who went to tampa that was 15 million guaranteed compared to 13. And hardy is obviously the more talented player.

This season was lost because of hardys poo, cams surgery/injuries and Ron reverting back to his former self for the most part

Pretty accurate assessment.

I can't get past this notion that people think it would have been a great idea to throw money at players who, although they still suck, don't suck quite as bad as the guys we paid less money.

How in the hell does spending more money on bad players qualify as a solid team building strategy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettleman came in specifically stating he wasn't just going to throw everyone out and replace them with his own people.

 

And only an idiot would fire a head coach coming off that kind of season with a future looking bright.

 

Well, only an idiot would gut that team and that is exactly what he did. Gettleman is sh!t with or without Rivera but the buck stops with our beloved owner. After 20 years wit is pretty easy to connect the dots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, only an idiot would gut that team and that is exactly what he did. Gettleman is sh!t with or without Rivera but the buck stops with our beloved owner. After 20 years wit is pretty easy to connect the dots.

 

Gutted the team...riiiiight.

 

There's this thing called a salary ca...you know what, nevermind :rolleyes:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as Gettleman extending Rivera, it doesn't mean much either way.

 

In the NFL, if you're coaching in the last year of your contract, it's considered a massive slap in the face and basically a guarantee you won't be back. Harbaugh this year, Fox for the Panthers. 

 

and it's not like rivera is expensive or anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and keep in mind, it's not like anyone here was complaining about the rivera extension when it happened. Gettleman really didn't have a choice.

 

it wouldn't be hard to pull up a thread from the offseason where people who criticized rivera and the way the team played offense were ripped to shreds by the frothing masses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Which is why I'm all for trading Lamelo. Guy misses half of every season. I swear he just likes to sit on the bench to show off his street clothes. I think it negatively impacts the other guys who do the same. If guys don't want to play, they don't need to be here. Coach and gm need to get stricter
    • See, I have a different view of it. I think that just the opposite is very true, and often proven on our very own team.  Look at the impact that CMC had when he was here.  Look at how bring in two top rate IOL to play guard last season made a huge difference in finally getting a stable front for Bryce to live behind. It took a while for it to bear fruit, but those last games were just relevatory. And off ball linebackers like Luke Kuechly, not just running a defense but dictating the game when he's on the field, truly remarkable what a difference that makes. Personally, he had as much or maybe even more to do with that Super Bowl appearance as Cam did.  What I see in the NFL is teams trying hard to cover up for a lack of good linebackers by stacking the D-line. But it gives them a crust defense, one that is hard and crunchy on the outside but a feast within. Linebackers shouldn't just rule the middle of the field, but should be directing traffic and working as enforcers.  But hey, whatever. "Devalued" positions often come back to bite you in the ass when they are neglected. Ask anyone who has had to clean up the mess left behind by a former college coach who took over a pro team and brought their college recruiting mindset in. Yanno, like Matt Rhule did.   
    • I see it this way--XL was raw.  Raw players when drafted who are forced to start immediately are very raw players in the NFL-- How is he helped? TMac will shift the focus of the defense away from XL.  XL will be more experienced.  He will have an offseason of jugs work.  He is a very good athlete.  He can only get better.  Wallace?  Same thing.  He will get better with an improved defensive front and the addition of these heat-seeking head hunters at S.  I think about the players we will have on defense in 2025 that we did not have in 2024. Derrick Brown. DE Brown III NT Wharton DE Jones Edge Moehrig S Princely. Edge Scourton. Edge Ransom. S Cam Jackson NT Roseboom  LB While we may not know what we have, we know what we don't have--  
×
×
  • Create New...