Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I was casually browsing Twitter. Marc James is obsessed


MGH1989

Recommended Posts

With the Panthers and Cam Newton. Pretty funny actually. Also likes to bring up how the Panthers let Smitty go. Which is hilarious because he use to talk mad poo about him, but when Smitty would be in studio he would suck him off. I wonder how long until he mentions this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That guy is as sleazy as they come. While we all have flaws, it boggles the mind how two faced this guy is/was. I don't know how someone can sleep at night talking one way to a man's face, then another behind his back, on a routine basis, all on public airwaves/the net. He seems the type whose time on earth will pass someday like everyone in this life, and whom no one will remember or remember as anything other than a Master Douche. Sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

letting steve smith go wasnt as bad as u guys think. Smith avgs 4 catches a game.  Thats ok but nothing stellar.

Yup

Steve was unwilling to renegotiate his deal (I wouldn't either at 35) and keeping him would have cost this franchise dearly.  People ignore that part.  Smith knows how to draw attention to himself and make people think he is actually better than he is.  Look at his numbers.  He had one of the lowest yardage per target rates in the NFL, and had 740 yards last year. 

 

And his attitude was detrimental to young WRs.  He was a dick, basically.  No WR ever prospered here who was signed or drafted after Smitty was.  I think the number who tried is around 35.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup

Steve was unwilling to renegotiate his deal (I wouldn't either at 35) and keeping him would have cost this franchise dearly.  People ignore that part.  Smith knows how to draw attention to himself and make people think he is actually better than he is.  Look at his numbers.  He had one of the lowest yardage per target rates in the NFL, and had 740 yards last year. 

 

And his attitude was detrimental to young WRs.  He was a dick, basically.  No WR ever prospered here who was signed or drafted after Smitty was.  I think the number who tried is around 35.

 

the cap scenarios have been laid out pretty clearly in a bunch of threads.  it usually falls on deaf ears though.

 

it makes me think of a politician who can stand on the soapbox and give an energetic, rabble rousing, but ultimately simplistic speech on a populist issue that gets the audience fired up.  it doesn't matter that a lot of very real, very serious factors don't square with what they're saying because it's emotionally resonant and stirring which is why it's effective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

letting steve smith go wasnt as bad as u guys think. Smith avgs 4 catches a game. Thats ok but nothing stellar.

Did you see that game winning 80 yard td he had called back against Cincinnati due to a bogus offensive pass interference call? You may be right about the cap savings being worth it as he is only getting older, but it is wrong to understate what we lost.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...