Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Smith attempted to fight Jermaine Wiggins after loss?


countryboi

Recommended Posts

I think 'tried to start a fight' is accurate if someone walks up to someone and starts just verballing laying into them trying to get a speak out of them.

 

But all he said was "approached." 

 

He got you all to bite when he said, ...tried to start a fight..." and at the end of the statement says, ..."approached."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you serious? You think this situation is justified and was handled with any level of maturity? I'm curious....

no not at all, too grown men getting into an altercation not a good look but mostly in this thread it's blaming smith when in fact both men should share equal blame......don't say something about someone or a franchise the have there all to and be surprise if they approach you about it, he had the same opportunity as smith to walk away and be the bigger man.

Some of you act like you would have brushed it off but In reality some here would have socked the poo out of the guy for talking reckless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Somehow, that got back to Steve Smith. He approached Wiggy at Gillette Stadium after the game.” 

 

When did the definition of "approach" include "fight," "start a fight," "throw a punch" or any other words or actions to that effect? Don't you think if Smith actually tried to start a fight or even raised his voice at Wiggins that more descriptive and colorful words would have been used to get more media attention? By using the word "approach" this only says that nothing happened except that Steve Smith, Sr. walked in the general direction toward Wiggins. 

 

You fuggin' guys are hilarious.

You missed the previous page. Page 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

When did the definition of "approach" include "fight," "start a fight," "throw a punch" or any other words or actions to that effect? Don't you think if Smith actually tried to start a fight or even raised his voice at Wiggins that more descriptive and colorful words would have been used to get more media attention? By using the word "approach" this only says that nothing happened except that Steve Smith, Sr. walked in the general direction toward Wiggins. 

 

You fuggin' guys are hilarious.

You missed the previous page. Page 3.

 

Oh well. Wish he would have popped him.

 

Wiggins: "Oh, wah, wah, wah, not in front of my kids... wah, wah, wah... my kids...."

 

And then proceeds to start screaming at Smith and calling him a bitch in front of his own kids... what a guy. I wish Steve Smith would have decked him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh well. Wish he would have popped him.

 

Wiggins: "Oh, wah, wah, wah, not in front of my kids... wah, wah, wah... my kids...."

 

And then proceeds to start screaming at Smith and calling him a bitch in front of his own kids... what a guy. I wish Steve Smith would have decked him.

Yep that's the mature thing to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no not at all, too grown men getting into an altercation not a good look but mostly in this thread it's blaming smith when in fact both men should share equal blame......don't say something about someone or a franchise the have there all to and be surprise if they approach you about it, he had the same opportunity as smith to walk away and be the bigger man.

Some of you act like you would have brushed it off but In reality some here would have socked the poo out of the guy for talking reckless.

Maybe I'm getting old (43) but i don't care very much about what some other guy says about me anymore. If it's not derogatory stuff toward my wife or kids, it is simply not worth getting upset to where it escalates into something like this. That's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gustavsson would be insane. I think we would have to break the bank to afford that move. Which, I don't think is necessarily a bad idea. Ultimately, Freddie isn't likely to be around more than a couple of seasons more. We can all agree that unless they have a fleet of sports psychologists working on Kochetkov, he will never be capable of getting his head on straight enough to compete.
    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
×
×
  • Create New...