Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deflate-Gate: Patriots Being Investigated For Deflated Footballs


Recommended Posts

The reported deflated balls, certainly didn't determine the Patriots blowing out the Colts, but if it's proven that  cheating was involved there should be a penalty.

 

My gut feeling is that Bill Bllicheat himself, would not risk a penalty on something  that minor,although it's been proven he would do it on a larger scale.

 

Problem is,once a team has a history of cheating, team  members, other than the HC may feel it is alright to bend the rules in their favor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who are you even talking too? I haven't seen anybody say deflated balls was why the Colts lost. I know I'm not remotely implying that. If the Pats used under inflated balls contrary to the rules. - that's cheating. That simple point has nothing to do with excuses, the final score, or hate for any franchise. It's pretty basic....I'm opposed to cheating regardless of who's doing it - that's just me.

And if they broke the rules then they will pay the price.

When a team goes to 9 AFC championships and 6 Superbowls in a 12 year span, an average of 50% they in the Superbowl, then everyone that cant handle it will always come up with excuses just to make themselves feel better.

I dont like Cheating either, but many times it wasnt cheating, it was just operating outside the norms and someone with more money made a stink about it.

The footballa can weight between 13-14 ounces and are inspected and marked before they go to play and marked when they are taken out of play.

Nothings impossible, but I just find it difficult for someone to have deflated the balls and then expect an official not to notice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not cheating to be smarter than other teams, use the rules against them, execute their plays better than anyone.

Like the spygate. Its just haterade. All teams have tape on each other. Mike Rucker once bragged that we killed mike Vick because we got their snap count.

You have a playbook and can make in game adjustments.

Only cowards and losers blame other people for their shortcomings and failures.

 

 

I get what you are saying, but after years of allegations and some of it proved to be true. When do the Cheatroits stop getting the benefit of the doubt? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The refs are tasked with inspecting each ball and making sure it is fit for play. That's not the job of either team. If under-inflated balls are being allowed into the game that's on the refs.

 

This is just a Colts beat writer who would rather write a story about "omg look at these patriot meanie heads!" and not write about how the Colts got beatdown 45-7 and their golden boy first ballot HOF QB played like garbage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any attempt to subvert the rules to gain an unfair advantage shows a distinct lack of integrity. That may not mean much to you, it obvious it doesn't mean anything to the Pats, but thank goodness it isn't a lost concept on everyone.

I have no idea if it's true but Im sure we will find out.

 

If they broke the rules, then they deserved to be punished as such. My point was the score was 45-7! This wasn't a close game at any point and the ref's supposedly checked the game balls at half time. So this is an attempt to minimize the result of the game and turn it into a classic, "the Patriots cheat" argument.

 

I am a man of integrity personally and professionally and while I find it repulsive to thing that the Patriots would deflate balls below the threshold allowed, the balls were checked, the game continued, and the Patriots in true Patriot form came out and dominated the second half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if they broke the rules then they will pay the price.

When a team goes to 9 AFC championships and 6 Superbowls in a 12 year span, an average of 50% they in the Superbowl, then everyone that cant handle it will always come up with excuses just to make themselves feel better.

I dont like Cheating either, but many times it wasnt cheating, it was just operating outside the norms and someone with more money made a stink about it.

The footballa can weight between 13-14 ounces and are inspected and marked before they go to play and marked when they are taken out of play.

Nothings impossible, but I just find it difficult for someone to have deflated the balls and then expect an official not to notice.

I'm not passing judgement....I have no idea of whether it's true or not. Defending the Pats record isn't necessary because it's not about the Patriots. My point is simple. I think cheating doesn't make you smart, it means you lack basic integrity. That's all and it goes for all teams so please don't make the Pats some martyr for being accused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you want to punish them, take their afc title from them and put the colts in the superbowl. They will never cheat again.

 

Why would they do that? The Colts were playing with a regulation ball against the Patriots defense, not the Patriots' offense. The Patriots offense still had to run its plays, which the Colts' defense still failed to stop. What difference would it make if it was true? The Patriots win 24-7 instead of 45-7? It had nothing to do with the Colts' lack of offensive production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't matter. Cheating is cheating and it damages the integrity and credibility of the game and the league. Especially from a team that's been busted before - recently.

 

Fine, hold that against them. The fact of the matter is they have been the epitome of a championship Franchise for going on 15 years now and not all of that has come as a result of supposed cheating.

 

You all are beginning to sound like the whiners on ESPN comment sections simply because you read an article and completely agreed with what was presented to you without knowing the actual facts of the situation. Everyone knows the job of the media is to stir the pot, especially in sports journalism. It has taken on a form of yellow journalism used to create hysteria and manufacture hatred, or love for one team or another. It is good for the media to continue the narrative that Andrew Luck is the second coming The Golden Calf of Bristol due to the story line they began creating since he was at Stanford.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would they do that? The Colts were playing with a regulation ball against the Patriots defense, not the Patriots' offense. The Patriots offense still had to run its plays, which the Colts' defense still failed to stop. What difference would it make if it was true? The Patriots win 24-7 instead of 45-7? It had nothing to do with the Colts' lack of offensive production.

 

Exactly, 45-7! People just dislike the Patriots, in the words of the fictional character Kim Jong Un, "They hate us because a they ain't us!".

 

And that's what I read from many of my fellow Panther's fans. It's relatively easy to view this objectively but many of you have already formed your opinion on the Patriots since that 2003 loss.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found it interesting that an officials time out during the game held up play because they didn't have the right ball on the line of scrimmage for NE by the ball boy?.....................First time I ever saw that in a game.

 

Does anyone remember when NE won a playoff game with a snow plow clearing the ground for the FG kicker to have a clean kick.......but that plow was no where to be found for the opposing team when they had to kick a FG.

 

Maybe it was the first time you NOTICED it. For the love of The Golden Calf of Bristol, did none of you fools here take psychology 101 and understand how you're personal feelings toward a team or person could affect the way you view things?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a delay before the third-quarter-opening kickoff that might have included game officials investigating the balls the Patriots were using.

 

So on that note 17-7 Balls where checked then Brady and company score 28 unanswered.

after the check this sounds like the NFL digging at something that's not there to protect Luck

 

So if a ball has less pressure, that makes it impossible for a defense to stop an offense? Who knew? ~SARCASM

 

The Colts' offense couldn't muster more than 7 points using the same size footballs that they use every game? Who knew? ~SARCASM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they broke the rules, then they deserved to be punished as such. My point was the score was 45-7! This wasn't a close game at any point and the ref's supposedly checked the game balls at half time. So this is an attempt to minimize the result of the game and turn it into a classic, "the Patriots cheat" argument.

I am a man of integrity personally and professionally and while I find it repulsive to thing that the Patriots would deflate balls below the threshold allowed, the balls were checked, the game continued, and the Patriots in true Patriot form came out and dominated the second half.

I'm not doubting your integrity at all....My points were directed towards the "theory that a team may have cheated" and not directly at the Pats specifically in this game because we don't know if it's true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody is saying they won the game because of deflated balls. But say officials are paid off in a game between say UNC and, I don't know, Sister Mary's Nuns. Just because Carolina beats them by 100 doesnt mean cheating should be ignored

 

The ref's checked the balls. Now if you want to say ref's aided in the outcome of a 45-7 game go ahead. The only way to solve this type of issue, or at least absolve the possibility is by putting ref's on a fixed salary and make it a full time job for them. They have no incentive to not accept kick backs as their checks are not guaranteed.

 

And UNC would never win by 100. Not on a boat with a goat, with a bear with no hair, with a mosquito drinking a mojito.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not doubting your integrity at all....My points were directed towards the "theory that a team may have cheated" and not directly at the Pats specifically in this game because we don't know if it's true.

 

I would prefer that people accept their spanking like a 4 year old, and move on. Test the balls if you want but 45-7 isn't a fluke, especially given the Colts history against the Patriots since Luck has arrived. The result shouldn't be any more surprising than the Seahawks come back.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Going to be Sunday afternoon again which sucks.
    • The Panthers Huddle is usually just propaganda …this one was actually good im feeling good about the Morgan and Canales marriage  the proof is ‘in the pudding’ however  …and have to remember a first time head coach and players who have never played together before but they can’t possibly be worse than last year  the wild card to all this,  too,  is Young  I wish I felt better about him but I don’t  Morgan says he wants ‘dawgs’ not ‘dogs’ I.e. pit bulls vs poodles…I see young as the latter, not the former  Regardless, life is full of surprises…maybe he is a lot more than I see.  I’m not a scout or coach 
    • There are a lot of moving parts to this type of questions and way too many variables to consider to really predict how the outcome would have been any different in 2023 with Dalton starting more than just one game.  But instead of focusing on that Seattle game, another game, and the game following it, are more intriguing to me.   Week 16 vs Green Bay.  Young had the best game of his rookie season.  23/36 (64%) for 312 with 2 TD and no INT.  Thielen (6/94), Chark (6/98) and Tremble (4/59) all had huge plays in the passing game. The running game was a different story.  Hubbard (16/43) and Sanders (3/3) combined for just 46 yards rushing.  Mays was starting at LG and Jensen at RG.  The offensive line was able to protect Young just enough to keep the Panthers in the game until the very end.  But this wasn't because they were playing at a high level, rather the Packers defense played horrible this game. But this horrible defensive effort by the Packers allowed us to see what could be possible if Young had time to process and throw. Fast forward to Week 17 vs Jacksonville.  The offense was shut out and the offensive line allowed 6 sacks and 8 more QH's.   If you go back and watch these games back to back, the line play if very noticeable.  When Young had time in process and move, he was spot on.  When the line collapsed, like most QBs, he was ineffective. When you draft a QB 1st overall in the draft, especially if you trade up to do so, you hope to get a QB that can make plays despite the struggles around him.  Think Newton his rookie year.  Should the Panthers have traded up in the 2023 draft to the 1st overall and should they have drafted Young at that spot? My opinion is no to the first question and no QB in 2023 was worth trading up to take in the top 10.  Neither Stroud, Richardson or Levis would have been worth it.   But none of them would have fared any better than Young either with the Panthers, in my opinion.  Stroud had a good season in Houston but he didn't have a Cam Newton or Lamar Jackson season.  He needed slightly above average talent in one of the worst divisions to make the playoffs. He had the season we were hoping for in Carolina but wasn't going to get with Young or Stroud. Now, I'm not trying to put Young up on a pedestal here.  There are a lot of questions that still surround him and his ability to be QB1 on the Panthers in the future.  But the issue last year wasn't just the play at the QB position.  And really, I don't think the WR issues were as much as people make them out to be.  The real issue on this offense was the line and the running game.  If your line can't get a push to run the ball or pass block to pass the ball, you have no offense.   Start Young. Start Dalton.  Draft Stroud, Richardson or Levis.  Kidnap Mahomes.  Doesn't matter, I think the end result would have been the same. 
×
×
  • Create New...