Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Need new camera


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

Perfect. Good deal I think. That's a pretty damn solid camera that will do everything you need it to and more. I don't know how it compares to the 60d I mentioned, but it should be similar..

I prefer buying the body alone and then choosing a lens but the kit (18-55) will work for you. I'd still buy a cheap 50mm for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

canon has a 50mm 1.8 for around $100. I use it for all kinds of things but it's perfect for family stuff, portraits and poo. It's their cheapest lens, and you can tell in the build, but the picture quality is great. The option of opening up to 1.8 gives you perfect depth of field for that stuff.

get a decent DSLR body and you'll be able to use it forever and buy different lenses for everything you need. Take some time to read about how DLSRs and lenses work and you'll be glad you have one. You might end up using it for other things.

A 60d body is like $400.

 

the nifty fifty lens is great, but it helps to have a quality external flash to go with it. i use my cheapo 50mm ($75 used) for all portraits on my canon 40d ($300 used) but use a canon speedlite 430exII ($300 new). makes for great, clear images. it can be a bit bulky, but the quality is terrific.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the nifty fifty lens is great, but it helps to have a quality external flash to go with it. i use my cheapo 50mm ($75 used) for all portraits on my canon 40d ($300 used) but use a canon speedlite 430exII ($300 new). makes for great, clear images. it can be a bit bulky, but the quality is terrific.

Yeah I haven't bought myself a good flash yet. Everything I shoot is pretty much outdoors and I like using natural light. But I should get one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For point-and-shoot you can't go wrong with whatever the latest Panasonic Lumix TZ camera. My old camera was one, it never got old giving the camera to my friends who know nothing about cameras or photography and see them loving it. Served me well for many drunken holidays and even family holidays to the likes of SF, BC, Niagara Falls etc.

post-15526-142210251269_thumb.jpg

post-15526-142210252494_thumb.jpg

post-15526-142210253568_thumb.jpg

Agree with the NEX recommendation. A great mix of compact click-and-shoot and true DSLR, with compact form (as long as you get one with a pancake lens). As you get familiar with it you can start spending money on fantastic lenses like the 18-200.

post-15526-142210205727_thumb.jpg

post-15526-142210207794_thumb.jpg

post-15526-142210205727_thumb.jpg

post-15526-142210207794_thumb.jpg

post-15526-142210251269_thumb.jpg

post-15526-142210252494_thumb.jpg

post-15526-142210253568_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you looking to do video and photos? Either way I recommend a Canon or Nikon DSLR. The bodies usually aren't too expensive it's the lenses you want to save your money for. 

 

 

Here's an example of a solid starter DSLR with a great walk around lens.

 

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/945054-REG/canon_8595b003_eos_dig_rebel_t5i.html

 

 

 

I am a bit of a Canon boy btw. I shoot on a 60D, 5D, 6D and a 1D X. You can't go wrong with Nikon though either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Lol Atlanta looks to have lost their young edge rusher, has no 1st round pick, a complete mess at QB, a new coaching staff… And we swept them this year. Says what they think of us. 
    • I mean, you can only go so far with the propping up. When a guy's numbers are as bad overall as Bryce's you have to try to find specific niches to sell. It's just funny that they're honing in on where he's probably weakest to try to prop him up. Whether it's a pro-Bryce conspiracy or not, it echos my chief complaint about PFF's analysis for years. When your purely statistical analysis badly skews from the eye test of actually watching the games, it should be screaming at you that you need to modify your system not double down on it. PFF is awesome at compiling stats but their grade systems are highly flawed and they never seem to try to improve them.
    • Then why is Byce also last in other PFF stats?  The deep ball thrower stat by PFF can simply be flawed vs some conspiracy trying to prop up a QB on a team that a former employee now works for.  Both of these guys were also hired AFTER the Panthers had already drafted Bryce.  Trying to prop him up with a made up stat while he struggled would be a detriment to their own team honestly.  
×
×
  • Create New...