Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Melanie's Marvelous Measels - A Children's Book


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Does you child have measles from his or her worthless parents choosing not to vaccinate? 

 

Well no worries! As little Sally lays there with her future in doubt, you can read her this lovely story.

 

 

 

61bNGvoLVYL._SX258_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

 

 

LINKY

 

 

 

Some of my favorite comments.....

 

 

 

 

My infant daughter went blind after contracting measles from an unvaccinated child, and yet there's no braille version of this wonderful book for me to give her someday to explain to her how awesome the disease that took her sight away is.

 

 

 

 

As a carpenter who specializes in itty bitty coffins I can't say enough good things about this book, my customer base has been growing at an epidemic rate!

 

 

 

 

The author explores the wondrous theme of how highly-contagious, deadly diseases are beneficial in nature, such as through natural selection. They can also be beautiful. Little-known fact: Georges Seurat's La Grande Jatte was inspired by the pretty spots he saw on the faces of dying Parisians before the advent of that dastardly measles vaccine. Killing yourself, your children, and others is our right as Americans. Thank the gods for authors willing to tell this beautiful story and help kill children.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a mother and a RN, I feel people who choose not to vaccinate their innocent children are unimaginable morons. There is a reason life expectancies have increased as the centuries progress. You know, advances in science such as vaccines. Morons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a mother and a RN, I feel people who choose not to vaccinate their innocent children are unimaginable morons. There is a reason life expectancies have increased as the centuries progress. You know, advances in science such as vaccines. Morons.

 

 

Yeah, but they read a few websites, so their opinion is just as valid as people who went to school for years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh look, chart with incorrect dates. Tell me more....

 

 

You tell me more - what dates are you specifically calling into question.  Would you mean the vaccine that was introduced in 1963 and had to be pulled and reformulated due to all the children who were getting sick from it and dying?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a mother and a RN, I feel people who choose not to vaccinate their innocent children are unimaginable morons. There is a reason life expectancies have increased as the centuries progress. You know, advances in science such as vaccines. Morons.

 

 

As a nurse you know little more than I do.  Life expectancies have increased generally because of better diets and sanitation.  Medicine has little to do with increasing life expectation in a healthy population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Medicine has little to do with increasing life expectation in a healthy population.

 

i don't know if this is statistically true or not, but it's beside the point, and the point is that dangerous communicable diseases that have been wiped out for decades are back because of a couple of raging fuging morons with rand paul stickers on their minivans. you can say measles aren't the devil all you want, but the standard of devilish isn't just death, it's debilitation too, of which infant blindness is a pretty solid component.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are really concerned with childrens health,  concentrate on things that statistically matter.  Like how fat kids are getting and all the attendant health problems that entails long term for them.  Don't let the lamestream media get you in such a dither about something about as likely to kill your kid as a lightning strike.

 

SBSMSchoolsandChildhoodObesityRates_v3-0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't know if this is statistically true or not, but it's beside the point, and the point is that dangerous communicable diseases that have been wiped out for decades are back because of a couple of raging fuging morons with rand paul stickers on their minivans. you can say measles aren't the devil all you want, but the standard of devilish isn't just death, it's debilitation too, of which infant blindness is a pretty solid component.

Not so fast with the Rand Paul association. The Daily show nailed the anti vac crowd awhile back and many of them were more liberal than those that might vote for a Paul.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha. You're right. All those years spent studying, caring for those that are sick, and working beside medical doctors who know more than you or I could ever dream of knowing, surely doesn't give me just a little bit of credibility at all. Thanks for putting me in my place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 99% of my complaints generally are front office complaints.  It may not appear that way always but that's where I have been for some time.   It's also why I constantly talk about random parts the last several years....  to this day, if they were going to draft Bryce Young....I thought they needed to do specific things.   They have literally done the opposite.   In a certain world, I would LOVE an AT.  A Bryce Young.  An XL.  All sorts of people.  How they have chosen to put it all together here? Meh.  I still think if Bryce Young is your QB....the easiest and obvious play for a team....would be a dynamic slot WR, a rec RB, and solid rec TE.  Spread it out.  Let him be the point guard.  I still think this team is being built for a different type QB....one that a Jake Delhomme style QB would thrive more in.  Which is in fact the heart of what Canales has been around and done.  So I nitpick it all.  If I had thought Bryce Young was going to rebound....I would have NEVER been all in on XL like I was.  I was all in XL because I thought the BY experiment was about to over quick.  Ladd would have made way more sense if you believed in BY IMO.   I don't think this team did.  I think Dave drafted XL because they were mentally ready to move on and did after 2 weeks.  and I thought the Frank think was bologna from the jump.  I just have hate the pairings and plan every since Rhule year 1.   Rhule year 1 was the last time I really thought this team was in a good place to give it a go.  It went horribly.  But....the zoomed out plan was pretty logical all around.  Rhule just was not ready and a clown on top of that.   I still think the Dave, BY, XL, Tmac build 3 round pegs and a square one at the end of the day.  Worst thing to happen to BY was to land in Carolina IMO.   Which is often how the NFL plays out.  Where you land and what the org does matters probably more than raw talent/ability often.  I do not actually have a problem with Adam Thielen in a vacuum.  He is overperforming in a vacuum all things considered.  
    • Bryce Young could throw for 40 tds and 4500 yards this season and my gut instinct still says you would triple down on hating him.
    • They should just be predetermined slotted contracts.  I feel like that was the intention of the current system, but they left too much room for interpretation about guaranteed money.  I agree though.  You play for who drafts you or you don't play.
×
×
  • Create New...