Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mock Draft With Jake Fisher in 1st Round

Soul Rebel

By Soul Rebel,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

gettlemanjack Newbie

gettlemanjack

Posted
Posted

the latest mock by Josh Norris of Rotoworld also has Fisher going 1st R. His OL going 1st R:

#10 The Scherff - "think Scherff can stay at tackle, but a team might really value him inside"

#17 Ereck Flowers - at RT

#20 Jake Fisher

#21 La'el Collins - "I absolutely, 100 percent think Collins can stay at tackle and play at a high level"

#23 Cameron Erving - at C

#25 Andrus Peat - PANTHERS

#29 D.J. Humphries

http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/cfb/52439/344/post-combine-mock-draft?pg=2

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

Not a fan of Fisher, he was getting owned against OSU.  Duke, I feel, is too small for an NFL RB, however, I'm a big fan of the third and fourth round picks.

 

Owned is a pretty big exaggeration. Wasn't his best game, but he won his fair share of battles too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Soul Rebel Mentor

Soul Rebel

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Outside of the OSU game, I don't recall Fisher having a bad season.  In fact, the article mentioned how Oregon suffered when he went down with an injury, but sprung back when he returned.  Classic case of 'what have you done for me lately' I guess with the Championship game.  

 

I do like the draft as a collective whole and the Waller kid intrigues me. Maybe an eventual replacement for Olsen in 3-4 years as a project?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gettlemanjack Newbie

gettlemanjack

Posted
Posted

Ourlads (which is used by pro scouts and personnel) has us taking Jake Fisher at #25, writing: "For Cam Newton ever to realize his full potential there needs to be a sense of protection in front of him. Fisher is not underrated in the NFL scouting circles and projects to be a long time starter."

already off the board were Peat, Flowers, La'el, Scherff and Erving

http://www.ourlads.com/nfl-mock-draft/mock/2015/ourlads-mock-draft-1.0-pre-combine/81

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Carolina Still Not Respected

      By Navy_football · Posted

      I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • electro's horse
      The "now it's been three years" Grade for the 2023 Draft

      By electro's horse · Posted

      probably the 2nd worst draft in team history
    • tukafan21
      Strength of Schedule

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...