Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Poll: Which team is nose diving harder?

JawnyBlaze

By JawnyBlaze,
in Carolina Panthers

First to the bottom  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. Which team is blowing up the worst?

    • Saints
      13
    • 49ers
      30
    • Eagles
      3

  2. 2. Which team will be worst this year of the three?

    • Saints
      29
    • 49ers
      15
    • Eagles
      2

Recommended Posts

JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I dunno.  Kelly's a good offensive mind, but I had a hard time picking between Eagles and 49ers for the first one.  I can't help but think he's more of a brilliant mad dictator than crazy like a fox.  Sooner or later the players are going to get sick of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
blackcat Collaborator

blackcat

Posted
Posted

I feel like the Taints and 69ers are going to just flat out suck, which would be a continuation of last year if you look at it.

With Philly, they're starting over, but they're doing it Chip's way. He's going to get Mariota and he's going to have some room to lose. Next season for him is the beginning of 'his' experiment.

All 3 will suck, with SF being the worst and Philly and NO battling for first place b/t the 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sean Payton's Vicodin Grand Master

Sean Payton's Vicodin

Posted
Posted

I don't think the taints will suck too bad. i can see a .500 season from them. having a good interior line has been sean paytons secret ingredient for his tenure, and ungar is a great first step in restoring that. they'll prob pick up an o-linemen with one of their picks and brees will go back to being "that guy who throws for a million yards on an 8-8 team".

 

with that said, their defense will still be poo.

 

niners are fuged

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheNewStandard Newbie

TheNewStandard

Posted
Posted

I just think Kelly is going for quick, heady players to fit his system and happy to get rid of any guys that don't fit his system. Essentially bringing the college game into the NFL where newly drafted collegiate guys can step right in, making the tradition easier with better production at an earlier stage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AKPantherFan Apprentice

AKPantherFan

Posted
Posted

Chip Kelly's is a very smart football coach.

Do not underestimate.

Plus. He has his system and if u don't fit, u don't fit.

In college he was replacing his best lost talent with freshmen and getting better results.

It takes an NFL COACH 3 years to get established.

Sorry. But that's the way it works. Don't worry about the iggles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • bandu
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By bandu · Posted

      if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • SmokinwithWilly
      Dan Morgan on the Rich Eisen show

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Jackson113.2
      Unc Basketball thread

      By Jackson113.2 · Posted

×
×
  • Create New...