Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Godzillatron Rule Question


Montsta

Recommended Posts

If a QB looked downfield to see complete blanket coverage on his wideouts, was rushed out of the pocket and had no options, could he conceivably just huck the ball up at that thing to get a do-over of the play? I don't know how high it is, so this may be completely out of the realm of logical thought, but it got me wondering.

I haven't had a "do-over" in competetive sports since I was 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No they cant just raise it when they want to. it takes major construction to move it and its to close to the season to do it know. Jerry Jones said the Tenn punter was going out of his way trying to hit it each and everytime and that in a real game situation, the punter would never be near it since they try to hit the sidelines or close to it. There is currently no offical set to "watch" the scoreboard to see if its hit so the coaches can challenge to see if the ball grazed it or not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought I saw on SportsCenter last night that Jerry Jones wasn't going to raise it, and "for now, the NFL is going to allow it."

How funny would it be to see the Iggles play Dallas twice a year, and cannon-armed scrambling Vick see's that the defense is covering the play perfectly, so he just throws the rock up at that thing to get a do-over. I'd imagine they'd have to honor the rule right? I don't think there is any intentionally hitting it clause in the rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...