Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Toyota RAV4


Lumps

Recommended Posts

So I have a budget of no more than 20k. I want a sport utility type vehicle but not a monster SUV. I am looking at Toyotas and Hondas mainly, the RAV4 and the CR-V. I am buying used, few years old, with no more than 30k miles on them.

My concerns are the power. I really want a Honda or Toyota because this car needs to last 10+ years. I know it's all about how the maintenance rather than the brand to some extent I realize that, I know how to buy a car.

My concern is as I said the power. A 6 cylinder RAV4 is very rare at my price point and in general. Seems to me a 4 cylinder in a sport utility such as this seems underpowered...is that true?

I've been eyeballing Nissans but I like the feel of the Hondas and Toyotas best but any suggestions of a vehicle matching my description would be awesome, preferably ones backed with experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather have a V6 Accord or Camry than an underpowered SUV...and that is really what it's coming down to. But I really want more room and size of the SUV but not if it means flooring it to get up to 70mph.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Acura RDX

/thread

Except my max is 20k and I'm not buying a vehicle with 60k miles on it.

It'd be nice and I've been looking at Acura cars...those are in the price range.

Same with the Subaru...those are pricier cars, fellas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every non-affiliated site comparison I've read cites 2 things:

1. RAV4 edges in cargo space by 3.5 cu ft

2. Rear seat fold down advantage to Honda.

 

Other than that, virtually all of them say you won't go wrong with either and it comes down to a matter of preference for the buyer. Which do you prefer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every non-affiliated site comparison I've read cites 2 things:

1. RAV4 edges in cargo space by 3.5 cu ft

2. Rear seat fold down advantage to Honda.

Other than that, virtually all of them say you won't go wrong with either and it comes down to a matter of preference for the buyer. Which do you prefer?

Definitely the RAV4, for the reasons mentioned and others. It's the power issue. My car now has a 4cylinder and is slow, I can't imagine driving a bigger car with a 4 cylinder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife has the v6 RAV 4 and loves it. Has plenty of power and gets decent gas milage at 23/28 mpg. Her's is an 06 with 100k miles on it and it still runs like a champ. I know there was a period in the production of RAV 4's when they went through a lot of problems. I want to say it was 08-10, but I'd double check to be sure. My mother-in-law got one of them and finally got rid of it because it had so many issues, all under warranty though. 

 

The only real down side I have seen from RAV 4's is they eat tires like crazy. My wife is almost through her 3rd set. The last set I bought were 80k mile tires and she got 29 out of them. It seems to be a common issue from every tire guy I have talked to. 

 

Just my $.02. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce has been in the NFL 3 years and still looks like a very mediocre QB. Most games are nothing but mediocre plays with a highlight reel every now and then.  He is a very INCONSISTENT QB and it’s very fustrating. He does not deserve a 5th year option, even though the Panthers and all the dumb asses in the front office will give it to him.
    • I’ve rarely ever been more sure of anything than losing out — but how can anyone say with a straight face “Bryce hasn’t improved, but Canales has and he’s masks his flaws”. You have to be so out of touch with reality to put one way above the other when discussing those two. 
    • Last night was the classic example of a visiting team just holding on through the wave of emotion a home team has at the start of a big time game. Bama’s first two kickoff returns really set them back as far as playcalling and allowed OU to dictate field position. The emotion of the home crowd fed into what OU was doing at that point, and it felt like Bama would not be able to overcome that.     Once the kickoff returner was told to fair catch every kick, the game shifted, as Bama wasn’t starting each drive inside their own 15. It was then that Bama was able to make some plays, outscoring OU 34-7 the rest of the way.  I think the last 3/4 of the game proves Bama was the better team. OU was just able to ride the initial wave of emotion to a big lead, but Bama held on just enough.  However, had OU blocked the punt on Bama’s second drive and scored a TD (vice a FG on the ensuing drive), things likely would have been different.  Anyway, Roll Tide!
×
×
  • Create New...