Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carson City Council (Los Angeles) approves $1.7-billion NFL stadium


Kevin Greene

Recommended Posts

 

 

The Carson City Council unanimously approved a privately financed stadium for the San Diego Chargers and Oakland Raiders on Tuesday night, barely two months after the public announcement of the proposed $1.7-billion project.

"There are two things we need in California: rain … and football," Carson Mayor Albert Robles said to cheers after the 3-0 decision. "And football is coming to Carson." 

The vote continued the proposal’s breakneck pace in the competition with a rival concept in Inglewood to end the NFL’s two-decade absence from the Los Angeles area. In February, Inglewood’s City Council adopted a ballot initiative for a $1.86-billion stadium as part of a sprawling mixed-use development backed by billionaire St. Louis Rams owner Stan Kroenke and Stockbridge Capital.

Representatives of the projects will update a committee of NFL owners on their progress Wednesday during a meeting in New York.

Supporters of the Carson project needed just eight days to collect more than 15,000 signatures in support of their ballot initiative, almost twice the number required.

Like Inglewood, Carson’s City Council had the option of adopting the initiative or scheduling a public vote later this year. The prospect of transforming a long-vacant former municipal landfill site next to the 405 Freeway into a 70,000-seat stadium proved too tempting to delay.

The ballot initiative process allowed both proposals to skip lengthy environmental reviews in a race in which time is of the essence.

 

 

Football in LA getting much closer to reality.

 

http://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la-sp-nfl-stadium-carson-20150422-story.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonder if this affects the Rivers situation before the draft.

 

 

Definitely, Rivers does not want to live in LA from what I've read.

 

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2015/apr/20/ladainian-chargers-rivers-spanos-krasovic-nfl/

 

MInd you, LT is still bitter towards the Chargers for being cut loose late in his career, but that was mostly the Bolt's GM at the time, since canned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely, Rivers does not want to live in LA from what I've read.

 

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2015/apr/20/ladainian-chargers-rivers-spanos-krasovic-nfl/

 

MInd you, LT is still bitter towards the Chargers for being cut loose late in his career, but that was mostly the Bolt's GM at the time, since canned.

 

I know, I just don't know though whether this was expected anyways or if it's new to them and changes things. It doesn't guarantee the Chargers are moving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, I just don't know though whether this was expected anyways or if it's new to them and changes things. It doesn't guarantee the Chargers are moving.

 

 

True dat, for decades the NFL has used the threat of a move to LA to get cities to build new stadiums for their teams. Well now San Diego really has to be paying attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...