Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carson City Council (Los Angeles) approves $1.7-billion NFL stadium


Kevin Greene

Recommended Posts

5 teams in Cali?

What a clusterfug that would be.

Not to mention trying to make divisions for a 34 team league. Also talent dilution. There's already enough trouble trying to find 32 decent QBs and finding enough competent OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rams to LA in Inglewood is the most likely to happen. Kroenke has already invested millions on real estate and partnerships with investors to finance the stadium.

Chargers and Raiders on the other hand, their move is contingent on both teams moving. There's a report that states the city of Carson will lose money if only one team moves.

A team in Los Angeles is almost certainly a done deal, with the Rams being the team.

It's just now a waiting game for the teams to petition to move and the owners voting. The Rams will be playing at the Rose Bowl in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will certainly provide nice leverage for whichever teams want to hold their current city hostage for some free stuff now that there is going to be an unoccupied NFL ready stadium sitting there waiting for a suitor.  Going to be some shaking down going on around the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they build it with more than 40,000 seats they are lying to themselves.

 

 

This always cracks me up.

 

Dodgers, Angels, Lakers, Clippers, Kings and Ducks always at or near the top in League attendance nation wide.

If you don't understand the NFL Football Stadium, or rather lack thereof decades ago, then you have no clue of what actually occurred.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, but I don't think any city should lose their team.

Expansion, 2 teams to LA.

All Goodell thinks about though is playing more games across the pond.

Why wouldn't he be thinking global though for the NFL? It's like with oil. The well of new fans here is pretty much tapped. The NFL is probably the biggest thing in our country now. But you have all this untapped money sitting over across the ocean of course they are looking to expand. It's smart business at the very least

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will certainly provide nice leverage for whichever teams want to hold their current city hostage for some free stuff now that there is going to be an unoccupied NFL ready stadium sitting there waiting for a suitor.

This isn't minecraft. the stadium takes 2 years to build

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This always cracks me up.

 

Dodgers, Angels, Lakers, Clippers, Kings and Ducks always at or near the top in League attendance nation wide.

If you don't understand the NFL Football Stadium, or rather lack thereof decades ago, then you have no clue of what actually occurred.

 

All I know is the last few years the Rams were in Los Angeles their attendance sucked.  Now if it is your assertion that over the last 20 years LA has evolved to the point that it may now choose to support an NFL team, even if it sucks for the first few years, then maybe you're right.  It certainly wasn't happening the last time they had one, however. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will certainly provide nice leverage for whichever teams want to hold their current city hostage for some free stuff now that there is going to be an unoccupied NFL ready stadium sitting there waiting for a suitor.  Going to be some shaking down going on around the league.

 

The proposal is for a privately financed stadium built by and for the Chargers and Raiders. They won't even start construction until both teams are guaranteed to move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...