Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Randy Gregory is available at # 25 ....


PntherPryd

Recommended Posts

Gregory himself claims he was up to 242 prior to the combine but had an illness that caused him to drop to 235 which is what he weighed in at there.

 

 

Do you have a link saying he was 245 at his pro day??

 

this is what i was thinking about then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, fails a drug test when you KNOW you're going to be tested, talk poo about a potential employer all be it true, get in a pissing contest on Twitter. No thanks. Unless were talking a top tier wr or left tackle that kind of dumbassery isn't worth the headache.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weed should be legal in ALL states. As long as he is not high on the field.

Smoking isn't the issue. It would be the same if he failed a fugin chocolate test. WHEN HE KNOWS ITS GOING TO BE TESTED. It shows that he's doesn't give a fug about taking the job seriously. If someone is about to give you millions and you still cant pass a test that you KNOW will be given its a bad look.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...