Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cord Cutters Sound Off


Jase

Recommended Posts

I am looking to cut the cord in October.

 

I have small kids so getting multiple PBS stations is important to me.  I have tried the bunny ears indoors route and some stations are spotty.  South Charlotte is lower than all of the stations, making reception more susceptible to hills... and trees.

Anyway, to try to get more stations, I'm looking at getting an antennas direct db8e and sticking it in my attic.

DB8e_Front_Hero-1-625x462.png

Heck, I may get two of them and gang them together.  We already have netflix and I was thinking of getting sling TV and add the sports package.

 

What's everyone's cord cutting setup like?  I see two disadvantages so far: There's no way to get NFL network or the hornets games.  NFL Network I can watch on my phone (thanks verizon!) but it looks like I'm SOL about the hornets games (how will I live without the paralyzing mediocrity?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tried it for 2 months when I moved out to Denver.

 

 

Im a much happier Comcast customer today. Too many nights where I spent more time looking at the ApleTV screen saver because the neighborhood decided it was streaming content night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We cut the cord in February. I am going to preface this by saying your TV experience will absolutely change in many ways, and for some people the dramatic change is too much for them to handle and they hate it. YOU have to change YOUR habits... 

 

We went from paying over $200 using Uverse and having every channel to the following:

Comcast 50mb internet $50 (you need a high speed internet option here for multiple streaming devices, att could only offer 18mbs. Don't go cheap here). 

Get Netflix and Sling TV (HBONOW also)

We got the Amazon version of an attic antenna. It gets about 60 HD channels (we live in the burbs of atlanta). The cost is great and it's easy to install if you know what your doing. $99 for antenna

steaming devices - Smart TVs are garbage, don't rely on them. You need to have a streaming device on every TV. I have one of each, Roku, Apple TV, Chroamcast. The best hands down is the Roku3. The Chromecast is nice on my kids playroom TV because I can throw YouTube Ninja Turtles or Netflix Strawberry Shortcake on with ease. The Roku lets you stream SlingTV without having to use your device. Apple TV has a very small selection of apps and sucks in my opinion. 

 

As far as sports programs, yes it sucks you won't be able to see them from your couch right now. The major sports organizations are smart enough to know cord cutting is reaching some pretty high masses and I am sure there are plans for streaming in the future. You have to get creative with how you watch sports. Again, it's about changing your habits.  Hell I was going to have the May/Pac fight at my house but couldn't cause I don't have PPV.  But the money we are saving and the more time my family is spending together makes me never want to pay for cable again  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We currently pay for the 50mbps internet which TWC will be boosting to 200mbps sometime over the summer to keep people from jumping ship to google fiber.  We have a firetv and netflix, and we're getting slingtv.  I guess we're "cord compromisers" not true cord cutters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We currently pay for the 50mbps internet which TWC will be boosting to 200mbps sometime over the summer to keep people from jumping ship to google fiber.  We have a firetv and netflix, and we're getting slingtv.  I guess we're "cord compromisers" not true cord cutters.

I just got rid of sling, it could be good one day but right now it's crap! To buggy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We came to the realization that, other than sports, our kids dominate the TV watching in my house.  And they watch more netflix than anything else.  Easy decision when directv is between 95-120 dollars per month, depending on how much of a discount we can negotiate with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just got rid of sling, it could be good one day but right now it's crap! To buggy.

​That sucks, I was hoping someone would come in with an opinion on sling.

They are new (and cheap), though, so I'm still tempted to give them a shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no issues with sling TV...been using it on a Roku since Day one and it has come a long way. My guess is the people who are having issue with asking are probably having issues with their internet and not the service. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we had access to Google Fiber I'd do it in a heartbeat, not even thinking about it with our current TWC setup.

 

​Really? You only need about 7mbps to stream HD over netflix...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me preface this by saying I work for a cable company, but it's not in your area so I'm not trying to sell ya. This is my opinion from my own experiences and from what customers tell me. Don't do Sling TV. It's limited. You can only stream on one device at a time, it eats your data, it's inconsistent, and when you add the sports pack it really doesn't save you much. It's going to be difficult to keep your sports programming strictly OTA. Depending on your household viewing habits once you add the different OTA packages (like HBONow, Sling TV, and other services) you can be paying just as much if not more than a cable package. Plus you're using more data, which will increase your internet costs. If it's just you, maybe you'll save a bit. But if you're throwing in kids shows and home and garden shows and stuff on top of your sports, you could end up paying more. Plus the hassle of multiple bills. I would suggest at least talk to your local cable company. We have packages geared toward streamers; I would imagine they do. Plus you can bundle your internet, too. If you do cut the cord, I would still avoid Sling TV if your household consists of more than you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...