Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brenton Bersin continues to impress

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted

​The list is ordered by people who have caught the most first downs..  Bersin's 84% first down percentage is a great number.

11 of 13 passes is not enough of a sample size to even make the list when the other guys on the list have 60 something  rec.  And we're main targets.. 

I  was being sarcastic  in the 1st place..  You shouldn't  be called or known for  anything with  13rec in your resume.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mol3m4n Mentor

Mol3m4n

Posted
Posted

Bersin is going to be our 4th or 5th receiving option at best, and people are bickering about him like he's going to be our #2, lol.

Hypothetical, but if say Benjamin and Ginn get hurt around the same time, wouldn't that 4th or 5th receiver be invaluable?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRed Newbie

TheRed

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hypothetical, but if say Benjamin and Ginn get hurt around the same time, wouldn't that 4th or 5th receiver be invaluable?

​I mean, if we're down 2 of our top 4 WR's, we're just about fugged anyway. So what exactly is there to debate here?

Benjamin is our #1, Olsen though he is a TE is basically our #2 WR, Funchess would be #3 in that order, Ginn would be #4, then Bersin would be battling it out with Cotchery for #5.

Again, I don't understand all the hyperbole like Bersin is going to be a top 2  or 3 option.

Edited by TheRed
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted (edited)

Fans have a ridiculously "all or nothing" attitude when it comes to some players.

Screw up one play and no matter what you've done before,  you're no good, you were never any good and you should never play another down for this team again.

It's silly.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted

Bersin is going to be our 4th or 5th receiving option at best, and people are bickering about him like he's going to be our #2, lol.

They actually did something to have a following and let's be clear nobody blinked a eye when gGettiswas cut and Lafell wwasn't resigned..  We actuallyhad people claiming CCotchery and Avant were better.. 

Serious qquestion  if your 4th and 5th Wr is not a special teams guy or big time play maker..  Why is not a wasted roster spot??  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...