Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Final Fantasy 7 remake


RelaxImaPro

Recommended Posts

Love it! I just hope they keep the core game play,  turned based combat. Only thing besides the obvious graphics jump is just make more side quests.

​This is my biggest thing. With Square's love for active battle systems I really hope they don't try to mess with it. It won't be FFVII without turn based battle. Can do voice acting, redo the visuals etc. Basically take the game everyone loves and put a new coat of paint on it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a feeling they're going to try and give it a Kingdom Hearts/FFXV style battle system to have it look more like the Advent Children movie.  I think Square even so much as said so a couple of years back they want all of their FF/Kingdom Heart games to resemble a fight scene from that movie.

If done right, I wouldn't be completely opposed to this... but it would be weird playing FFVII and it not be turn-based or at least active turn-based.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope they don't go in needlessly removing poo like the cross-dressing scenes, the gym sequence where you do the squats, etc.

It was cheesy as hell but it's all the little things like that that added to the charm of the game.

Also, they don't need to go in adding a whole bunch of unnecessary poo to the story like those guys from Crisis Core either.  Maybe a mention or side quest or something, sure, but bogging it down with all that new stuff could backfire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope they don't go in needlessly removing poo like the cross-dressing scenes, the gym sequence where you do the squats, etc.

It was cheesy as hell but it's all the little things like that that added to the charm of the game.

Also, they don't need to go in adding a whole bunch of unnecessary poo to the story like those guys from Crisis Core either.  Maybe a mention or side quest or something, sure, but bogging it down with all that new stuff could backfire.

​Exactly. You can't take things away but also add too much, gotta walk a very thin line.  Id enjoy having extra difficulty setting or a new game plus after beating it for the 1st time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still have the original unopened. I wonder if it's worth anything

As long as it's not the Greatest Hits with the green label I think it's worth a good bit. I have my original too but it's definitely not unopened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...