Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hezonja or Bust...


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Plain and simple...   Point blank, period. 

 

The last few drafts, I didn't really care one way or another.  But I care this time...  

 

It's just my opinion, but I DO NOT WANT DEVIN BOOKER.  Imo, he is PJ redux, and honestly, that's an insult to PJ, because I think PJ is a better natural scorer and a better athlete.  Regardless, they are too similar and it serves no purpose to draft him with PJ already on the roster, considering we haven't even given PJ a chance to fully show what he can do yet either.  The bottom line is, they are similar in size and imo, booker is less explosive and less of a natural scorer.  I'm not impressed at all. 

 

Now, Hezonja...   This is a milestone for proudiddy.   I'm the guy every year when they go through mocks and the talking heads are pushing the international players, I almost immediately write them off.  I want no part of them, with very, very few exceptions over the years.  Biz is a prime example.  I told people I did not want him at where he was projected and all I was told was how young he was, and how he would "develop."  I didn't care.   In the late 20s?  Sure,  he would've been worth it, but to me, to make the trade we did to acquire another pick in the single-digits and then turn around and pick Biz, I was disgusted. I said at the time, his best case scenario was Ben Wallace, and that was not likely.  Well, look at us now...   It's very likely that he can still become Ben Wallace, and to his credit, I think he's already a better offensive player than Wallace.  Additionally, I much rather him be our starting center going forward and ditch Big Al, but that's another thread... 

Back to my point, I just feel like Hezonja is going to make an instant impact.  I feel, if given the minutes, he will be the rookie of the year.  He is uber-athletic and a ridiculous shooter, and he IS a natural scorer with a true killer instinct and supreme confidence.  I don't associate any of those characteristics with Booker (hence why I prefer to give PJ his time to prove himself).  Hezonja is what we need, and I promise you he will be a difference maker from day one. 

I know I'm setting myself up for disappointment, but imo, there is no other option with our first pick...   And I doubt Hezonja makes it to 9, so we have to move up.  Easier said than done, I know, but I think for starters, Al's contract is a nice piece to dangle out there.  If we don't find a way to take Hezonja, I don't even want what's there at 9.  If we have to choose between WCS and Booker at 9, then we ABSOLUTELY NEED to trade back and take Hunter or Grant (who could be steals in the mid-first).  Booker is garbage and we don't need another player who has absolutely no offensive ability coming in (WCS), as our draft history is chock full of those guys. 

With Hezonja, we have flexibility.   Again, with his size, athleticism, and natural scoring ability, he gives us versatility...   We could play small and have a lineup of Hawes, Hezonja, MKG, Hendo/PJ, Kemba.  We could also play with a traditional lineup and use Hezonja at either wing depending on match ups and what we need.  He is pure offense.   And that's what we need, desperately. 

 

You're welcome. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually CB, I was watching the draft special on nbatv last night and their "Internet concensus"  mock had Hezonja falling to 10, IIRC.  Which I thought was hilarious...  But,  that's why I said we need to trade up. 

IM not saying WCS will be a horrible player.   I think if he applies himself, he can be a dominant defensive force and offers HUGE advantages in pick and roll defense.   That being said, hasn't our fan base had enough of drafting offensively deficient, defensive specialists across the board?   I can't take anymore of those picks.   And as you mentioned, imo, with the presence of Biz, WCS is redundant.   He sucks on offense and he's redundant, those are two characteristics of each and every one of our drafts and the reason we have been so bad for so long.

 

Thats why I say, trade up for Hezonja (which shouldn't be hard, as most mocks I've seen have him going between 6-8), or if not, trade back and take hunter or grant.  Or the other option is trade the pick altogether for an already proven vet. 

 

My other angle here is that the most likely piece to help us move up in a trade for hezonja would be Al's contract.   Imo, he has to go this offseason for us to improve.   In that scenario, Biz is re-signed and goes into the season as our starter - then we have tremendous defense and rebounding inside with guys like Hawes, Hezonja, PJ, etc, standing around on the perimeter ready to create or shoot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you are selling WCS short and way overselling Biz. Just to clarify, Mario is my favorite as well.

First, Willie has the freak athletic ability to guard all 5 positions. He is also 7'1, nearly a half foot taller than 6'9 Biz. Biz is still incredibly uncoordinated and learning the game, nevermind even shooting beyond 3 feet from the rim. Willie is nothing to write home about on that end, but he can at least catch an entry pass and finish.

Obviously Biz has shown his worth on the defensive end and provides a valuable skill in the "new" NBA, but how much is that worth. His qualifying offer is 4 million dollars. At 22 years old playing backup, is he really going to be worth a long term contract, especially when you can get a far more polished guy to do the same thing AND be on the rookie scale AND replace Al long term?

DeAndre Jordan is about to get a max deal. I think Willie could be that same type of player.

Tl;dr: YOUR OPINION IS WRONG! (haha, kidding)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deandre Jordan is about to get a max deal and he ain't worth it.  On the right team he can help but on a team with putrid offensive guards and forwards he would suck. He has no offense. He can dunk and can't shoot FTs he's a liability late. 

 But I agree with diddy big men who have only one talent (that being defense) is not the new nba. Time for the hornets to try something different. And my opinion weeks ago was bookers a potential bust. If we pick him I'm gonna have a hard time watching him sit on bench for 2-3 yrs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you are selling WCS short and way overselling Biz. Just to clarify, Mario is my favorite as well.

First, Willie has the freak athletic ability to guard all 5 positions. He is also 7'1, nearly a half foot taller than 6'9 Biz. Biz is still incredibly uncoordinated and learning the game, nevermind even shooting beyond 3 feet from the rim. Willie is nothing to write home about on that end, but he can at least catch an entry pass and finish.

Obviously Biz has shown his worth on the defensive end and provides a valuable skill in the "new" NBA, but how much is that worth. His qualifying offer is 4 million dollars. At 22 years old playing backup, is he really going to be worth a long term contract, especially when you can get a far more polished guy to do the same thing AND be on the rookie scale AND replace Al long term?

DeAndre Jordan is about to get a max deal. I think Willie could be that same type of player.

Tl;dr: YOUR OPINION IS WRONG! (haha, kidding)

I feel the same as everyone about Mario. He's my number 1. But I like WCS as we'll. 

also I think OP is underselling Booker. I didn't love him a first but the more I looked the better he looked. 

Where as PJ is a natural scorer, Booker is a natural shooter. He's not as streaky as PJ is. Plus he has great Basketball IQ. And I think he's just as good as an athlete as PJ. Booker tested surprisingly well at the Combine. 

What at gives people pause on Booker is upside. All he can do is shoot and pass. He definitely needs to add to his game. He's the youngest player in the draft so he has time to do it. It comes down to if you believe he can. I think his floor is JJ Reddick which ain't bad for 9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plain and simple...   Point blank, period. 

 

The last few drafts, I didn't really care one way or another.  But I care this time...  

 

It's just my opinion, but I DO NOT WANT DEVIN BOOKER.  Imo, he is PJ redux, and honestly, that's an insult to PJ, because I think PJ is a better natural scorer and a better athlete.  Regardless, they are too similar and it serves no purpose to draft him with PJ already on the roster, considering we haven't even given PJ a chance to fully show what he can do yet either.  The bottom line is, they are similar in size and imo, booker is less explosive and less of a natural scorer.  I'm not impressed at all. 

 

Now, Hezonja...   This is a milestone for proudiddy.   I'm the guy every year when they go through mocks and the talking heads are pushing the international players, I almost immediately write them off.  I want no part of them, with very, very few exceptions over the years.  Biz is a prime example.  I told people I did not want him at where he was projected and all I was told was how young he was, and how he would "develop."  I didn't care.   In the late 20s?  Sure,  he would've been worth it, but to me, to make the trade we did to acquire another pick in the single-digits and then turn around and pick Biz, I was disgusted. I said at the time, his best case scenario was Ben Wallace, and that was not likely.  Well, look at us now...   It's very likely that he can still become Ben Wallace, and to his credit, I think he's already a better offensive player than Wallace.  Additionally, I much rather him be our starting center going forward and ditch Big Al, but that's another thread... 

Back to my point, I just feel like Hezonja is going to make an instant impact.  I feel, if given the minutes, he will be the rookie of the year.  He is uber-athletic and a ridiculous shooter, and he IS a natural scorer with a true killer instinct and supreme confidence.  I don't associate any of those characteristics with Booker (hence why I prefer to give PJ his time to prove himself).  Hezonja is what we need, and I promise you he will be a difference maker from day one. 

I know I'm setting myself up for disappointment, but imo, there is no other option with our first pick...   And I doubt Hezonja makes it to 9, so we have to move up.  Easier said than done, I know, but I think for starters, Al's contract is a nice piece to dangle out there.  If we don't find a way to take Hezonja, I don't even want what's there at 9.  If we have to choose between WCS and Booker at 9, then we ABSOLUTELY NEED to trade back and take Hunter or Grant (who could be steals in the mid-first).  Booker is garbage and we don't need another player who has absolutely no offensive ability coming in (WCS), as our draft history is chock full of those guys. 

With Hezonja, we have flexibility.   Again, with his size, athleticism, and natural scoring ability, he gives us versatility...   We could play small and have a lineup of Hawes, Hezonja, MKG, Hendo/PJ, Kemba.  We could also play with a traditional lineup and use Hezonja at either wing depending on match ups and what we need.  He is pure offense.   And that's what we need, desperately. 

 

You're welcome. 

 

 

Thank fuging god someone feels the same way I do about Booker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I question McLemore's basketball IQ though. He doesn't seem to have a very good feel for the game. KCP, I don't think was ever considered a dead-eye shooter, more scorer. I agree on Staukas though, I really liked him last year, maybe he gets better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...