Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

26 Teams attend Isaiah Battle workout


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

I imagine that someone is going to put up a pick much higher than we are willing to part with and all this speculation will be pointless.

 

Personally, I would take a flier on him for a 5th rounder. But I highly doubt that will be enough to land him.

I saw a mock supplemental draft (yes I know it's ridiculous). It had Tampa taking him first in RD4. Every other pick in the mock draft was PASS.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question, not having paid a tremendous amount of attention to the supplemental draft in the past, does the league ever release what teams bid what for the players in the supplemental draft?

 

If nothing else, I would be curious to know what we bid if we indeed bid anything at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a

mock supplemental draft

(yes I know it's ridiculous). It had Tampa taking him first in RD4. Every other pick in the mock draft was PASS.

Well I think whoever posted that up definitely has the market cornered.

 

Tampa would make sense, actually and a 4th rounder isn't a terrible gamble unless his off the field issues are much worse "behind the scenes."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Food for thought-Russell Okung, Anthony Castonzo, Nate Soldier, Trent Williams, and Andrew Whitworth will be FAs next year.  "Most" teams already have more talent/stability than we do at the position anyway.  Could this drive Battle's value down even more?  Admittedly I don't have near the knowledge of the guy that our scouts that were at the pro day do, but on the surface the risk/reward of a 3rd day pick sounds awfully juicy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How shocked(pissed?) would you all be if we get him for our 1st (32nd overall) or 2nd (64th overall) pick?

Knock me over with a feather shocked with 1st.  But I assume we'd get the 5th year option?  That would be huge since this year is a likely de facto "redshirt" year anyway.  GMan was adamant about keeping next years picks at this years draft so I don't see it given his red flags, however small.

Simply shocked with a 2nd but excited.  It obviously means we truly believe he's our future LT and we can therefore look for a DB, DE, etc. with our first next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@DNewtonespn: Am told the #Panthers had two scouts at Clemson on Tuesday for OT Isaiah Battle's workout prior to the supplemental draft.

Well, that answers that.

He's 6'8" and 312 lbs per Gil Brandt

I've seen him listed anywhere from 295 down to 270.

He might be like our old buddy Jordan Gross, i.e. someone who has to put on a lot of extra weight.

I have a question, not having paid a tremendous amount of attention to the supplemental draft in the past, does the league ever release what teams bid what for the players in the supplemental draft?

If nothing else, I would be curious to know what we bid if we indeed bid anything at all.

Not that I've seen.

I'm not sure if they run it like a draft or like waiver claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only thing I said was he was part of the staff that made part of the decisions, and that I am judging the decisions made by that group as a whole. As assistant GM, you can pretty much guarantee his input held more sway than an intern or the guy that takes coffee requests. Fitterer didn't operate in a vacuum. Neither does Morgan now. While Fitterer did have the ultimate decision, to say that Dan had no input in ranking boards, evaluating FAs, trade offers or anything else would be asinine. We all know he did. Otherwise what the hell was his job as assistant GM? He wouldn't have been kept for 3 years if he was arguing every decision Scott ever made.    And the actual quote was "Morgan has done a bang up job in the draft and FA. Compared to what the last guy did, he is kicking ass and taking names." So is XL kicking ass and Brooks taking names from last years draft or did I get it backwards? We took Wallace over Payton Wilson because he was an injury risk after trading up for a RB with a torn ACL? Which one of the kicking ass and taking names was that?  Maybe we should review the thousands of gameday posts calling for XL to get off the field because he's a bust and can't catch a cold. We could review the posts about Brooks but... And Wilson. He's at 118 tackles this season vs 36 for Wallace.  I gave credit to Dan for a good draft this year. But I'm also not ignoring last year's draft either since he did that one after the last guy too.  That's not a strawman. 
    • And then, in week 18, we can take Mayfield out of the game and whoop Bridgewater's @$$ for good measure! Let the former QB revenge train roll on!!
    • If we keep our guards in tact ($$$) and go with Mays at C, some OT depth would be nice. I think we should be happy about CB with Thornton's development (pre injury) and Smith Wade. I think Ransom is developing nicely, but I would like to see a FS type for situations. We suck at ILB and Edge (as a whole). We should be OK at RB.  I hope we sign Dowdle to a short contract. QB?  There are signs of hope and development.  (I don't like our backup QB) TE?  Good draft for TE, but I think we are developing with Evans, Sanders, and Tremble. WR?  A #2 with Coker and Horn in the slot.  XL?  What is that? We should be good in 2026. Morgan does more than draft.  Free agency has been strong too.  (Just emptying my brain on your comment--sorry)
×
×
  • Create New...