Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Xbox360 for Newbs


shinner

Recommended Posts

So.....thinking of maybe picking one up nearer to Christmas for my son. Gonna turn the basement into something of a video gamers room. No idea what's what, what with all the various flavas of 360s out.

Someone gimme a layman's view of the 360 line...what to go for, what to avoid. Note, I'm not interested in the PS3 so don't waste a post telling me to buy one of those instead.

Grassy-ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you plan on playing games online over Xbox live? If so do you plan on downloading content from xbox live or just playing the games?

If your just going to play games and not download content like extra maps then I'd recommend the xbox 360 arcade. If you want to download extra content for games and other things off Xbox live I'd recommend the xbox 360 pro. The difference between the 2 is the arcade only comes with a 256mb memory card basically for saved games. The pro has a 60gb hard drive for saving all kinds of stuff you can get off xbox live. If your going to go with the pro you'll need to get it soon as it is being phased out and the only model left with a hard drive will be the elite with a 120gb hard drive once the pro is phased out. The elite is $50 more than the pro.

The standard package only comes with 1 controller so you will probably want at least 1 more controller. You'll need a xbox live gold subscription if you want to play online multiplayer. If you have a wireless network and cannot connect the xbox via an ethernet cable to your network you will need the wireless network adapter accessory as well. Of course, this is only if you plan on using the xbox online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you plan on storing movies on the hard-drive, get the regular XBOX 360 with 60GB. Don't get the Arcade. You can't do anything with it, including updates, patches or expansion packs because there isn't memory. Hell, you can't even save games after a while.

Other than that, just get an extra wireless controller, an ethernet cable and an HDMI if you have an HDTV and you're set.

Here's a breakdown of all 3 consoles.

http://www.xbox.com/en-US/hardware/compare101.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming you don't have a computer, these are the games worth getting in order of how amazing they are.

RPG

Fallout 3 - Stunningly gorgeous, graphically violent, pure visceral joy. Maybe the best game ever made

Mass Effect - Great story, great graphics, great gameplay, fug the Mako

Bioshock - IS MAN NOT ENTITLED TO THE SWEAT OFF HIS OWN BROW? This game is seriously like playing a work of art.

KOTOR - yes i know it came out on xbox but it plays on 360 and its still amazing.

Sports

Blitz: The League - more fun than Madden and you can play as Ron Mexico

Shooters

Halo - Keep in mind if you buy this you're going to have to spend about 100 dollars before you can play it online. And the game has a really big learning curve online.

All the COD are pretty much the same thing.

Whatever the last GTA was - that's a shooter right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go Elite, it's worth it. Something else to add is the quick charge kit. You just leave it plugged in and it keeps your backup batteries fresh. I love it.

If you're asking about games as well, the ones mentioned before are a good start.

You and your kid might dig some of the (new) old school XBLA games as well. Castle Crashers is like that Ninja Turtles arcade game from the late 80's (with RPG elements added) and Shadow Complex is like Metroid. Good stuff for $15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...