Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lewis says Nick Hayden will start

scpanther22

By scpanther22,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

scpanther22 Experienced

scpanther22

Posted
Posted

:cryin:

Lewis said he expected Nick Hayden would start at the other tackle position vacated when Maake Kemoeatu was lost to a season-ending torn Achilles' tendon. The other options are Louis Leonard, acquired from Cleveland last week, and Ra'Shon Harris, claimed off waivers Sunday from Pittsburgh.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/9890142/Beason,-Stewart-back-at-practice-with-Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherBrew Newbie

PantherBrew

Posted
Posted

Again, Nick Hayden = turnstile.jpg

I'm serious. He is a bum, Bruce.

If he was a complete bum he wouldnt be starting, do you think John Fox wants to lose and risk his job. Or maybe he knows more about football, and what is best for the team.

Nick Hayden is a project, and has good potential. Atleast, give him a fair shot before you completely bash him. It is possible for someone to get better and grow as a player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted

If he was a complete bum he wouldnt be starting, do you think John Fox wants to lose and risk his job. Or maybe he knows more about football, and what is best for the team.

Nick Hayden is a project, and has good potential. Atleast, give him a fair shot before you completely bash him. It is possible for someone to get better and grow as a player.

I'm just saying he is a bum, I suppose he could blossom into a turd. A "turd blossom", if you will. I just don't have as much faith in the talent evaluation, I suppose. Or perhaps he truly is the best we have to offer. If that is the case.....good God.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • kungfoodude
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
    • tukafan21
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Nobody is saying they don't count against the cap, because yes, they technically do count against the cap as it's money the team is paying and it needs to be accounted for. But what you're not grasping it seems is that if a player gets $10 million guaranteed in their contract, whether they get literally $0 as a signing bonus or $8 million as a signing bonus, it doesn't change the overall cap hit of the contract, because cap hits are about the guaranteed money, not how much is paid up front. The only thing that how much is paid up front changes, is how the cap hit can be spread out amongst the years. So yes, technically there could end up being a slightly bigger cap hit in year 3 and 4 due to a bigger signing bonus, but if that is the case, it also means there will be a lesser cap hit in years 1 and 2 than there would have been with a smaller bonus.  But over the length of the contract, the size of the signing bonus has literally zero affect on the overall cap hit of the contract, because THAT part of it is 100% about the guaranteed money and nothing else.
×
×
  • Create New...