Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Training Masks....


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I havent attempted to figure out the science behind the mask, but to me, i would think it serves a similar purpose as a weighted vest or those weights that you put on the end of a baseball bat while youre taking practice swings.  If you practice under harsher conditions, then the actual game seems a little easier.  Is there no validity to that?

The mask is trying to simulate lower air pressure, which it can't really do. To think of it another way, if you wanted to get training benefits from this, if you actually believed you were going to breathe better in your workouts or what have you, then you would wear this thing all the damn time, then take it off when it was time to perform. Wearing it only when you exercise decreases the intensity of the workout and over a long enough time frame is going to negatively impact your gains/results/whatever. 

Hypoxia training in VERY controlled environment has produced mixed results at best, and these are with actual machines limiting the amount of oxygen the body can receive. When they're wearing masks there's no appreciable difference. 

Baseball players having that donut on their bat is a mental thing more than anything else. Obviously you're not going to train with a heavier bat (will throw off your timing) and having it for some practices swings in the on deck circle isn't going to appreciably strengthen you. 

Weight vest training, again, is something good to switch it up and make something harder, but isn't going to appreciably change how you move. A lot of that stuff (battle ropes, flipping tires, weight vests) is just poo that casuals think look cool and give their money to mma/crossfit/EXTREME gyms or whatever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No you don't take more breaths for the same amount of oxygen. I'm at 6000' right now and it's still 20.9% oxygen. I've already covered this but no one fuging reads. 

It has nothing to do with the content of oxygen in the air, it's the air pressure pushing air into your lungs when you inhale. This is not a complicated concept. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has nothing to do with the content of oxygen in the air, it's the air pressure pushing air into your lungs when you inhale. This is not a complicated concept. 

Might want to check what you're defending. I have to take twice as many breaths as someone at sea level?

You people are dumb. But I'm just as big of an idiot for even trying to educate. DIAF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might want to check what you're defending. I have to take twice as many breaths as someone at sea level?

You are going to get less oxygen per breath at higher altitudes due to lower air pressure. 

It is the opposite reason you breathe special mixtures of oxygen when you go diving. Breathing the normal mixture of oxygen would basically kill you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because the last time I was at Big Bear, I got my ass kicked when I even attempted to do some light running, grappling and boxing. I was done 10 minutes in. Upon returning, I lasted at least 9 minutes longer (almost double) and I wasn't gasping for air.

Then you trained for nine months and did better. It's not like you did particularly well the first time so you had plenty of room for improvement. 

You don't need a magical mask to be less mediocre. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then you trained for nine months and did better. It's not like you did particularly well the first time so you had plenty of room for improvement. 

You don't need a magical mask to be less mediocre. 

That's awfully presumptuous. Sparring is an incredibly draining activity. His level of fitness was a constant relatively as far as I was concerned.

The fact that, in his experience it changed HOW he breathed by forcing him to breath through his nose longer during periods of exertion is what is of interest to me. That alone can make a big difference in performance if you mostly breathed through your mouth before hand.

And you are also ridiculously condescending...for no apparent reason. Logging on doesn't mean you have to check your civility at the door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No you don't take more breaths for the same amount of oxygen. I'm at 6000' right now and it's still 20.9% oxygen. I've already covered this but no one fuging reads. 

Well lets just say a person going from sea level to 6,000 feet will find themselves more winded at altitude doing the same work load. The mask restricts the air flow requiring the athlete to take deeper breaths. This trains the core muscles involved. Swimmers have done this for years using snorkels. Some even have clips on the top that you can close the tube to restrict air flow more.

http://www.stack.com/2009/02/01/holding-your-breath-with-texas-am-swimming/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well lets just say a person going from sea level to 6,000 feet will find themselves more winded at altitude doing the same work load. The mask restricts the air flow requiring the athlete to take deeper breaths. This trains the core muscles involved. Swimmers have done this for years using snorkels. Some even have clips on the top that you can close the tube to restrict air flow more.

http://www.stack.com/2009/02/01/holding-your-breath-with-texas-am-swimming/

 

I agree in a way. Like with any muscle, resistance training increases capacity. The intercostal and other respiration muscles will get stronger with increased exertion. However in high elevation it's more about profusion rather than muscle capacity. So although the percentage of oxygen in the atmosphere is the same, the thinner air means there is less oxygen to breathe.

Panda, school us a little in cave man terms. i get confused when i try to explain it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • in starts, he has played better, been more efficient and outproduced Bryce by virtually every statistical metric that exists in 2025.  And has the 2 head to heads over Carolina.  I mean, your jaw should hit the floor.  But not for the reason you are implying.  That freaking stings.  Denying these realities isn't going to help the Panthers build a better team going forward.     
    • He is basically having a polar opposite rookie season than Bryce. 4-3 as a starter on a very bad team.  68% for 237 passing yards and 19 rush per game. 9 TDs,  6 TOs in his starts.  and folks acknowledge the surprisingly play because no one thought poo of the random 2nd rounder and he is player better as a rookie thus far than so many prized picks did as a rookies (not just Bryce but a boatload of dudes).   It's only a sour issue to give someone props because he is a Saint and of course the Bryce thing.  It's like giving the TE in Clev props for having near identical production as the chosen one Tyler Warren.  Fannin is having a great rookie season in a very bad spot. 
    • This is a very weird take. The reason Shough doesn't deserve it is because he's only started 7 games. He's doing crazy well for a rookie and out playing plenty of vets with a worse roster. He's waaay above league average in a number of categories during his starts and he passes the eye test in game by making plays. Meanwhile Bryce Young had one of the worst rookie seasons of all time. Still TMac deserves it more. It's only been 7 games for Shough so he doesn't deserve any awards. Even if he gets to 9 he doesn't.
×
×
  • Create New...