The evolution of PHILLY BROWN

[Jeremy Igo]

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Stupid elementary lies and taking things way out of context which is your modus operandi.  I thought Gettis would have done better (and deserved to be on the team) more than Armanti Edwards. I thought Moore would be better for us than Brown (and still do),  and I thought Boykin would do more for us than Brown (and still do).  I am not going to apologize for that.  No one can prove that I am wrong.  These receivers are not my standard,  they are just either what was put before me or have been available.  Stop being so simple minded.  I know that you can think more analytically than you let on.   But, like I said,  it doesn't fit your stale narrative. 

The fact that 0 teams picked up Boykin proves you were wrong about him, no? 

[t96]

1 minute ago, Jeremy Igo said:

The fact that 0 teams picked up Boykin proves you were wrong about him, no? 

Well the Jets worked him out... Pretty much means he's better than all of our WRs.

[top dawg]

1 minute ago, Jeremy Igo said:

The fact that 0 teams picked up Boykin proves you were wrong about him, no? 

Not really.  If you think that teams would be clamoring to pick up any of our receivers at the moment,  then you'd probably be wrong. 

[TheRed]

Just now, top dawg said:

Stupid elementary lies and taking things way out of context which is your modus operandi.  I thought Gettis would have done better (and deserved to be on the team) more than Armanti Edwards. I thought Moore would be better for us than Brown (and still do),  and I thought Boykin would do more for us than Brown (and still do).  I am not going to apologize for that.  Young one can prove that It am wrong.  These receiver are not my standard,  they are just either what was put before me or have been available.  Stop being so simple minded.  I know that you can think more analytically than you let on.   But, like I said,  it doesn't fit your stale narrative. 

Funny you mention Boykin. Is he even with a team right now?

You keep going on about my narrative, but what about yours?

Alright look. How about this. You're a good enough dude. If I offer you a truce, and you can agree to not talk down on Philly Brown at least until after he has played a full season, I will play nice, and not mention your past gaffes anymore. But you have to hold up your end of it here. Deal?

[thefuzz]

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Not really.  If you think that teams would be clamoring to pick up any of our receivers at the moment,  then you'd probably be wrong. 

If you think that Brown, Cotch, or Ginn wouldn't get picked up by some NFL team...then you can't be helped.

[top dawg]

Ever

15 minutes ago, TheRed said:

Funny you mention Boykin. Is he even with a team right now?

You keep going on about my narrative, but what about yours?

Alright look. How about this. You're a good enough dude. If I offer you a truce, and you can agree to not talk down on Philly Brown at least until after he has played a full season, I will play nice, and not mention your past gaffes anymore. But you have to hold up your end of it here. Deal?

If you consider saying that he needs to be way more productive and consistent,  and then discussing his paltry stats as a means to point out this fallacy about some evolution after one game out of seven,  is talking down about Brown rather than speaking the truth, then you have the problem. 

If you and others stop trying to sell me snake oil and being adulterated homers about Brown and our bottom feeding receiver corps for the remainder of the season---stop trying to shoot sunshine up our collective asses about our world class receiving corps,  like you have done for years---then I will stop. Deal? 

It's the same old shat this year,  except Cam,  Stew,  and the defense are good enough to compensate for it. 

[TheRed]

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

Ever

If you consider saying that he needs to be way more productive and consistent,  and then discussing his paltry stats as a means to point out this fallacy about some evolution after one game out of seven,  is talking down about Brown rather than speaking the truth, then you have the problem. 

If you and others stop trying to sell me snake oil and being adulterated homers about Brown and our bottom feeding receiver corps for the remainder of the season---stop trying to shoot sunshine up our collecttive asses about our world class receiving corps,  like you have done for years---then I will stop. Deal? 

Wait, what? Who in the blue blazes has referred to our WR corps as anything close to "world class"?

Hell, I said numerous times that we should have considered trading for an established WR to make a Super Bowl run.

Also, I literally said in my first reply to this thread that he does need to do this more consistently.

I made a very fair offer, you went on yet another long winded, and irrational rant about Brown again.

So you can accept all those reasonable terms, or not.

[top dawg]

1 minute ago, TheRed said:

Wait, what? Who in the blue blazes has referred to our WR corps as anything close to "world class"?

Hell, I said numerous times that we should have considered trading for an established WR to make a Super Bowl run.

Also, I literally said in my first reply to this thread that he does need to do this more consistently.

I made a very fair offer, you went on yet another long winded, and irrational rant about Brown again.

So you can accept all those reasonable terms, or not.

Your posts don't end with this thread,  and it certainly doesn't address what I just said. 

[top dawg]

So bringing up his stats and saying he needs to be more consistent is an irrational tirade?  My stars,  the Internet obviously dulls minds. 

[csx]

9 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Ever

If you consider saying that he needs to be way more productive and consistent,  and then discussing his paltry stats as a means to point out this fallacy about some evolution after one game out of seven,  is talking down about Brown rather than speaking the truth, then you have the problem. 

If you and others stop trying to sell me snake oil and being adulterated homers about Brown and our bottom feeding receiver corps for the remainder of the season---stop trying to shoot sunshine up our collective asses about our world class receiving corps,  like you have done for years---then I will stop. Deal? 

It's the same old shat this year,  except Cam,  Stew,  and the defense are good enough to compensate for it. 

 

This may be the biggest straw man argument I have ever seen attempted. 

[TheRed]

Just now, top dawg said:

Your posts don't end with this thread,  and it certainly doesn't address what I just said. 

Oh but your random rant perfectly, and reasonably addressed mine then huh?

I meant what I said, and the offer still stands. I tried at least. Enjoy your afternoon sir.

[top dawg]

Random rant. Irrational tirade. Hyperbole is the adjustable wrench of trolls. 

[TheRed]

Now you're just acting like an angry toddler.

[top dawg]

4 minutes ago, TheRed said:

Now you're just acting like an angry toddler.

If I am an angry toddler,  then you must be my personal perverted pedophile.