Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Captain America: Civil War

scpanther22

By scpanther22,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

CarolinaCoolin Newbie

CarolinaCoolin

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, CCS said:

I was excited for this. It just looks like another Marvel faux epic at this point though. I'm glad Marvel is creating new franchises because their classic formula just doesn't cut it for me anymore.

Seriously guy? You are honestly going to tell me you are LESS excited after seeing this trailer? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaCoolin Newbie

CarolinaCoolin

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

To me, too. I mean, Bucky? Bucky is the reason for The Civil War???? I knew Marvel and Disney would water down the story arc for a movie adaptation but I hate this angle.

That's not the only reason for the civil war. We only saw the trailer but clearly they are still doing the philsofical differences between Tony and Steve. I mean I take your opinion with a grain of salt anyway. I'd bet my entire life savings you are the first person to make a thread bashing this movie regardless if it is good or bad just cause it's marvel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaCoolin Newbie

CarolinaCoolin

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Well, I comprehend that Marvel can't use the 'mutant' angle because Fox apparently owns those rights but this Civil War is a direct result of Rogers disagreeing with how out government views him and Bucky now. However, at the same time, Tony Stark goes from 'Screw you, big brother! You can't have my suit or my services!" to "Yes sir. Captain America and Bucky are a threat to National Security".

Sorry, your BS excuse for why I can't stand Disney's/Marvel conservative, cookie cutter formula is laughable. Odds are I'm a bigger Marvel fan than you.

You do realize Tony's characterization has been pretty consistent on this issue since the end of Avengers 1 right? Dude straight looked at the brink of all human life ending and thought he was going to die to by the end of that movie. That changes a person.  His actions haven't just appeared out of no where. But I wouldn't expect a DC fanboy who uses bullshit like "cookie-cutter" and "watered down" to describe the most successful expanded universe in cinematic history.

 

just save your posts for when DC FINALLY drops a movie trying to cash in on that marvel money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaCoolin Newbie

CarolinaCoolin

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Tony Stark's story arc in the MCU has been consistent? Ha! And ironically you're calling me a fanboy. Sorry, just because I don't agree every film Marvel Studios releases/produces is a smashing success (quality wise) doesn't make me a 'hater'. You, on the other hand, are a pompous nuthugger who can't handle criticism towards Age of Ultron, Ant Man, Thor: TDW, Iron Man 3, etc. You're probably one of those idiots who actually believes Spider-Man 3 was 10x better than Watchmen just because Spider-Man is a Marvel property.

Yep, I'm a DC fanboy who just happens to have Captain America: TWS, Guardians of the Galaxy, Iron Man, Blade and and X2 in his Top 10 CBMs of all time, and values underrated titles like The Punisher with Thomas Jane. 

If you have anything to refute that claim present your evidence now or walk away shamed. No one is praising every marvel movie. You just swing into every marvel thread spewing the same poo. We get it, you are an emo who likes dark comic book movies. You aren't cool for trying to poo on movies everyone else enjoys because you have built in bias.

 

"Sorry, just because I don't agree every film Marvel Studios releases/produces is a smashing success (quality wise) doesn't make me a 'hater'."

um you haven't liked any. From your posts you've gone out of your way to trot out the same shitty catch phrases to INSANELY successful movies because you can't handle how WB/DC has dropped the ball in every conceivable way until Chris Nolan brought them back to relevance. And this comes from a guy who ONLY owns DC comics. I'm no Marvel nuthugger. I'm a realist and you are a hater. 

The reason those marvel movies in your top 10 is because Marvel has simply been better at making comic book movies. That's the simple truth, facts, reason, and logic support this. and I know that hurts your little heart.

also you look dumb for trying to bring in a Sony movie has if that has any relevance on how Marvel studios makes better movies than WB

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRed Newbie

TheRed

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, CarolinaCoolin said:

You tried Francis. maybe go back to try to change the post you DIDNT respond to next instead of following me into other threads like a lost puppy?

Settle down Beavis.

Have a laugh every once in a while, you might enjoy it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Grand Master

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

Yeah they couldn't use mutants, and maybe they could use Inhumans but they only have had a part on Agents of Shield and the viewers aren't invested in those characters yet, so they have to use what we've seen.

We're going to get Black Panther and the new Spider-Man for the first time in this movie and we don't know exactly their roles.  It's still early and it was just a trailer.  Stark obviously wants to register EVERY "special" person so it's going to affect more than Bucky, but that just hits home with Cap obviously.  You think Stark wants Scarlet Witch just walking around unwatched? 

It's any important movie, I don't think Stark and Cap ever have the same relationship again after this.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • strato
      Where panthers draft ranked against Big Boards in 2023

      By strato · Posted

      Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • PleaseCutStewart
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By PleaseCutStewart · Posted

      Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...