Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

visiting the salt mines of south louisiana


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

my god are they pissy over at saints report. everyone wants brandon browner executed at dawn and they have threads with titles like "throw the towel in toss the babby out with the bathwater" and "too many dumb players" and furious rants about officiating (which conveniently ignore flagrant hit-to-the-helmet/facemasks and a gifted fumble-six.)

but the best one is a thread entitled "thank you michael mauti" which got the equivalent of 90 pie. in the torrid silence of a crushing defeat the only thing they could find solace in was an illegal hit on the greatest quarterback of this decade. harvest that salt saints fans, it's not like your sodium intake isn't already prodding the edges of the national health spectrum.

 

5665d9807215a_ScreenShot2015-12-07at2.04

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

The hit on Cam was legal.

No one said it wasn't.....just that your worthless fans like to celebrate trying to hurt another player.  Oh wait....that is was your franchise will forever be known for.

You took your best shot on him....just to watch him get up and proceed to rape your team with no lube.

Go back to the bayou you swamprat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MadHatter said:

No one said it wasn't.....just that your worthless fans like to celebrate trying to hurt another player.  Oh wait....that is was your franchise will forever be known for.

You took your best shot on him....just to watch him get up and proceed to rape your team with no lube.

Go back to the bayou you swamprat.

He clearly said, in the op, "the only thing they could find solace in was an illegal hit on the greatest quarterback of this decade". That's why I commented that it was legal. Maybe pay attention to the above post before attacking me? 

He was trying to hurt Cam? Was Davis trying to hurt Drew? Come on man. Cam even said he deserved the hit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, saints4lifeagain said:

He clearly said, in the op, "the only thing they could find solace in was an illegal hit on the greatest quarterback of this decade". That's why I commented that it was legal. Maybe pay attention to the above post before attacking me? 

He was trying to hurt Cam? Was Davis trying to hurt Drew? Come on man. Cam even said he deserved the hit. 

I was talking about the posters on your shithouse of a message board trying to celebrate a helmet to helmet hit on another team's QB....would not expect anything else from a Saints fan though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

in the torrid silence of a crushing defeat the only thing they could find solace in was an illegal hit on the greatest quarterback of this decade. 

 

10 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

The hit on Cam was legal.

 

7 minutes ago, MadHatter said:

No one said it wasn't.....

I'm so confused...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

 

 

I'm so confused...

well, you are a saints fan, so that is par for the course.

We should be discussing the disgusting Saints fans celebrating the possible injury of a player....and all you want to focus on is that someone thinks it was an illegal hit.

Guess you also think Bounty Gate never really happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Helmet to helmet contact is legal on a runner. Cam was clearly a runner at the point of contact and honestly its Cam's fault he took the shot by not being fully aware of the field of play. You can watch his face from the replay and see him looking towards the middle of the field and doesn't notice the linebacker till right before he gets hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering the fact that the defender came around from near the middle of the end zone just to lead with his helmet against our franchise quarterback kind of makes that a fairly borderline play that looks a bit like head hunting. Who knows his intent though.

Regardless, the Saints lost. No pity here, they damn sure wouldn't be showing any for us if the outcome were different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MadHatter said:

well, you are a saints fan, so that is par for the course.

We should be discussing the disgusting Saints fans celebrating the possible injury of a player....and all you want to focus on is that someone thinks it was an illegal hit.

Guess you also think Bounty Gate never really happened.

Yeah. My intelligence is low because I'm a Saints fan. Yet, you're the one who looks like the moron in this thread.

But, I digress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...