Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who's feeling worse today?


Matt Foley

Recommended Posts

the answer is B:

they thought they did something about their problem, plus Urlacher is out

A: we all thought (hoped in vain) that the Jack's problems that he has shown over the last 4 years would just magically go away, and many still do

C: they got beat on a fluke. hard to watch but easy to chalk up to bad luck this early in the year

D: they have the "they better wake up it's a new year" thing to lean on after game one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all three. probably the bears should. against a division rival and making the huge moves to get cutler they did only to see a performance that resulted in 4 INTs and a loss?

it just isn't pretty for any of those teams.

i don't care about them, though. i just know i still feel like crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't pat Mcnabb on the back too much. He had a pretty easy game of it yesterday. That, plus the rib injury is another notch in the column of those who think he's fragile and/or injury prone. If Vick gets a start up in Philly, get ready for one of the nastiest QB controversies ever.

Philly may have beaten us pretty badly, but we may also have put a serious crack in their season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One thing I didn’t consider is how thin this draft is at quarterback. That’s going to drive up the market for backups and borderline starters like Willis, Jones, and Jameis Winston. Because of that, we’ll most likely be priced out of the market for this tier of backup. 
    • We've already beat the #1 seed twice, why not one more? (Packers and Rams were both #1 seed at the time we played)
    • My determination has come down to this. Based on recent QB history, has Bryce's improvement warranted 50m per season? Lamar is the only original team QB to play on his 5th year. The others took major deals at the end of the 3rd, before or just after the option was signed. Chances are, we're getting asked for the same.  I haven't rooted for Bryce to fail. I've rooted for him to succeed so big that them signing that extension would give me no worries about our future at QB at all. We haven't seen that level of play consistently that this year. We haven't seen it in the past 6 games.  We're about to be at a threshold with Bryce and I worry about what this front office will do. We have a history of bad decision making and Morgan has been part of that group making those decisions. I don't want Carolina in the same boat Arizona and Miami are right now. It has nothing to with being right. It has to do with wanting to win for more than a single season. We've never had back to back winning seasons. Faith in their abilities is not warranted at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...