Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

FO Film Room: Cam more than his stats; best QB in 2015


UNCrules2187

Recommended Posts

 

Quote

For most quarterbacks, this play would easily have been one of their best for the whole season. For Newton, it's just one that he was expected to make on a regular basis. Newton completed just 60 percent of his passes, but his accuracy rate was 77.1 percent. And a 77.1 percent accuracy rate while throwing the ball downfield under pressure isn't logical.

...

We can compare his efficiency numbers to the other quarterbacks in the league. The quarterbacks who thrive from completely clean pockets. The quarterbacks who have ball-winning receivers who erase the need for accuracy. The quarterbacks who throw to dynamic, creative runners who can create yards after the catch on screens and other simple throws. Or we can be realistic. We can actually assess how rare a talent the Panthers passer is. We can actually acknowledge how high his performance level has been each week. We can appreciate how important he has been to his team's 15 victories this season without feeling compelled to diminish it by pointing to Luke Kuechly and Josh Norman.

Maybe it's inconvenient for some, but Cam Newton is one of the best quarterbacks in the NFL now. He was the best in 2015.

 

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/film-room/2016/film-room-cam-newton

thatsmyqb.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DabDeezNuts224 said:

of course it's an outstanding concept when its Cam 

It's an outstanding concept when it's anybody.

People talked about David Carr having the best completion percentage in the league.  He played in a WCO (which always inflates QB stats) and was all around terrible, but hey there's that.

Likewise, if you look at a stat sheet, Matt Stafford comes off like a star.  Except in reality he's rarely clutch and blows a lot of games in the fourth.

I don't judge by a stat sheet.  Never have.  Never will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DabDeezNuts224 said:

of course it's an outstanding concept when its Cam 

Quarterback rating, and most people for that matter, view QB stats as only throwing the ball. That's the inherent problem with QB stats. As a RW fan, you should realize that as well. Additionally, scheme can have a large affect as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Barry McCaulkinor
5 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

link does not work

It does. I couldn't click it either. I had to copy and paste it into a fresh window/tab. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

For most quarterbacks, this play would easily have been one of their best for the whole season. For Newton, it's just one that he was expected to make on a regular basis. Newton completed just 60 percent of his passes, but his accuracy rate was 77.1 percent. And a 77.1 percent accuracy rate while throwing the ball downfield under pressure isn't logical.

Let's see how many in the National media  (and Seahawk fans for that matter) will quote this line when discussing Newton's alleged accuracy issues?

SMH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's an outstanding concept when it's anybody.

People talked about David Carr having the best completion percentage in the league.  He played in a WCO (which always inflates QB stats) and was all around terrible, but hey there's that.

Likewise, if you look at a stat sheet, Matt Stafford comes off like a star.  Except in reality he's rarely clutch and blows a lot of games in the fourth.

I don't judge by a stat sheet.  Never have.  Never will.

Pretty much. There is so much more that goes into evaluating a player than stats. I remember saying this to myself especially during our first half of the season when Cam's stats were not very great but we were winning and some people still tried to label him as a bad QB because of completion percentage. All I could think to myself was that they don't watch the games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, IGSaint said:

Pretty much. There is so much more that goes into evaluating a player than stats. I remember saying this to myself especially during our first half of the season when Cam's stats were not very great but we were winning and some people still tried to label him as a bad QB because of completion percentage. All I could think to myself was that they don't watch the games. 

I've checked end of year stats before.  Invariably, I'll see a lousy quarterback somewhere near the top and a good quarterback somewhere in the lower half.

Stats have their place, but you have to know when to listen to Mark Twain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notice Huddler's: The author spoke almost exclusively  about Cam's passing, and didn't resort to the default running argument stats by many-even here.

You don't have to immediately talk about running, cause you think Cam's passing doesn't measure up. Even Jeremy could be doing this in his recent MVP thread.

Good thing is; Cam's passing does measure up to anyone. The only QB Panther fans should have to defer to this year is Tom Brady on General Principal.

Learn to beat these guys at their "own" arguments, and language (allegedly passing). Cause you can Panther fans.

Then, when you add the run component, it becomes an all out slam dunk, thrashing, beat down.

FWIW: Cam's got great stats to: #1 scoring offense. #2 passing TD's. Top 10 QB rating. And yes, those 10 rushing TD's as well. LOL

And just think, how many more "stats" Newton would have with out all the bad weather games, potential TD drops, and receivers being stopped on the 1 yard line? So, Newton would have even better stats than that.

So, don't be afraid to go head to head arguing Cam vs Palmer or Wilson on general principle/QB skill, mind you his overall stats compared to others. He covered them both (and also leadership, making others better as well, which I didn't get into)!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...