Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jay cutler should be fired!!!!!1!!11!


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

There was quite a difference in the way Cutler played vs Delhomme. That is why stats don't mean anything.

right, but the point is, most fans take 4 interceptions as a reason in and of itself, regardless of other factors like horrible offensive line play (which cutler did not have, btw.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this thread is pretty much a poor attempt at an endorsement for Delhomme because he threw 4 interceptions in less than half the pass attempts Cutler had.

oh and btw, Jake didn't even play the entire game

not quite... as much as i've been a jake supporter in the past, i think benching him was absolutely the correct decision, and if he doesn't show he's over it for good by the first half of the ATL game, he needs to be sat down permanently.

however, it also needs to be noted that there are more factors involved in stats that just the number. Most fans hear "four interceptions" and absolutely poo themselves, dig the poo out of their underwear and start throwing it all willy nilly and demanding the backup QB no matter what.

It's a stupid reaction. The Jay Cutler analogy serves to point out that four interceptions does not necessarily make a quarterback bad. It can, and it usually is a good indicator, but not always.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...