Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Shula is in full control of the offense


Growl

Recommended Posts

The players lost this game without a doubt. If you are watching this game it is obvious.

Shula may not have called a good game but he didn't get torched all around on the field, throw ints, drop passes, and commit penalties. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, csx said:

The players lost this game without a doubt. If you are watching this game it is obvious.

The WRs and Oline played poorly too, but Shula was the biggest factor who crippled any attempt we had at overcoming bad play. You can't overcome bad play when your coach is poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This poo that we're seeing now is the same poo we saw in 2014. Complete Mike Shula offense lead football. I just can't believe they put Shula in full control and I can't believe Rivera allowed it, but it's looking like that's what happened. This is not the same offense we have seen all year. This is exactly the same offense we saw in 2014 though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TN05 said:

It wasn't Shula that dropped 8 passes and allowed 7 sacks.

That still doesn't leave him blameless. This offensive playcalling was the exact same as 2014. Blame it all on the players if you want, but when your coach handicaps your offense then you can't overcome or do anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KillerKat said:

That still doesn't leave him blameless. This offensive playcalling was the exact same as 2014. Blame it all on the players if you want, but when your coach handicaps your offense then you can't overcome or do anything. 

No, but he's not the one messing up. Tolbert fumbled, not Shula. Gano missed, not Shula. Teddy Williams decided not to tackle, not Shula. Those things alone don't happen and it's closer. Take out those drops and it's a different game entirely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, csx said:

The players lost this game without a doubt. If you are watching this game it is obvious.

Shula may not have called a good game but he didn't get torched all around on the field, throw ints, drop passes, and commit penalties. 

That's all true. It's easier to blame Shula, though, then everyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TN05 said:

No, but he's not the one messing up. Tolbert fumbled, not Shula. Gano missed, not Shula. Teddy Williams decided not to tackle, not Shula. Those things alone don't happen and it's closer. Take out those drops and it's a different game entirely.

Yes he is the one messing up. When you throw away downs and leave less opportunities for your QB and don't call any short passing plays to help him out yes you are messing up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...