Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

White-as-a-bleached-cracker Greg McElroy now thinks Cam's teammates will disrespect him


tiger7_88

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, PhillyB said:

ps lol @ everyone getting offffffffennnnnndeddddddddddddd at a mildly racist white slur with no historical or contemporary or social or political or economic power to it being leveled with levity, but when it comes to extremely powerful words and the power dynamics that produced them the most they can muster is "b-b-buh... how come they're allowed to say it and we aren't?" or microaggressive comments about "the race card"

i'm proud of cam for refusing to change who he is even though it makes him a lightning rod. i honestly think he's opened peoples' eyes to the prevalence of bias in our society, and how it's hidden, subconscious, and normalized.

i hope he gives me an interview when i write a book about it.

"mildly racist white slur..."

This is my issue. Anti-white racism is downplayed and minimized. Why? 

Mildy racist? So it is mildly racist because the recipient is white?

Is it because of the slaves that no living white person has owned? 

I wish a Mod would lock this thread up. There should be no tolerance for racism...

...no matter how "mild" it is.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

"mildly racist white slur..."

This is my issue. Anti-white racism is downplayed and minimized. Why? 

Mildy racist? So it is mildly racist because the recipient is white?

Is it because of the slaves that no living white person has owned? 

I wish a Mod would lock this thread up. There should be no tolerance for racism...

...no matter how "mild" it is.

 

This poor tortured soul..... Someone used the word cracker.

THE HUMANITY!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

...and you demonstrate my point...

We've had this argument before about the word cracker being even remotely in the same category as ******, and it did not go over well at all. In fact it was pretty damn embarrassing for the huddle. Of course predictably, leading the charge was MadHatter, who thinks all black people do is play xbox all day, and use welfare. So if you plan on going there, prepare yourself for a ton of backlash, and rightfully so, because the word cracker has little to no history behind it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheRed said:

We've had this argument before about the word cracker being even remotely in the same category as ******, and it did not go over well at all. In fact it was pretty damn embarrassing for the huddle. Of course predictably, leading the charge was MadHatter, who thinks all black people do is play xbox all day, and use welfare. So if you plan on going there, prepare yourself for a ton of backlash, and rightfully so, because the word cracker has little to no history behind it.

Your flaw is that I never downplayed racism towards black people, nor did I refer specifically to the word "cracker."

Show me where I did?

If you have hatred towards anyone because of their color, you are a damn racist. Doesn't matter what color they are. It's not "mild" or less racist if it's a white person at the end of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TheRed said:

We've had this argument before about the word cracker being even remotely in the same category as ******, and it did not go over well at all. In fact it was pretty damn embarrassing for the huddle. Of course predictably, leading the charge was MadHatter, who thinks all black people do is play xbox all day, and use welfare. So if you plan on going there, prepare yourself for a ton of backlash, and rightfully so, because the word cracker has little to no history behind it.

You are arguing about crackers with white bread? I think you have been played sir.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...