Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So does elimination of the chop block significantly effect the Matsko scheme?

tiger7_88

By tiger7_88,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

tiger7_88 Experienced

tiger7_88

Posted
Posted

Question is for the coaches/technicians in this here forum (and I'm not either).

I've seen commentary in other NFL teams forums/newspapers as to the effect of the elimination of this block.  Personally, I'm glad they're doing away with it.

But how often has this kind of block been SCHEMATICALLY part of our run game?  If the answer to this question is "zero" or "very little", then I'm a happy camper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
O-Ther Newbie

O-Ther

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It hurts West Coast Offenses like Denver way more than it hurts us.

Do you know which of our 2016 opponents this affects besides Denver? Just like the news of Justin Houston's ACL problem today might make him unavailable for our game against Kansas City if we play them early in the schedule, I'm always eyeing the news pertaining to our opponents this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

Question is for the coaches/technicians in this here forum (and I'm not either).

I've seen commentary in other NFL teams forums/newspapers as to the effect of the elimination of this block.  Personally, I'm glad they're doing away with it.

But how often has this kind of block been SCHEMATICALLY part of our run game?  If the answer to this question is "zero" or "very little", then I'm a happy camper.

It would be pretty shitty for any team to coach their line to dive at the knees of a defender already engaged with a blocker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, O-Ther said:

Do you know which of our 2016 opponents this affects besides Denver? Just like the news of Justin Houston's ACL problem today might make him unavailable for our game against Kansas City if we play them early in the schedule, I'm always eyeing the news pertaining to our opponents this season.

I know KC is WCO (Reid).Pretty sure the Raiders are too. San Diego was always Coryell but I think they changed to E-P last year.

Honestly, most if not all teams have made use of it to a certain extent, but the WCO schemes tend to be more suited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, KillerKat said:

I was a kid man

That was back in 03.

If I remember correctly, Alex Gibbs was the Bucs line coach at the time. I think he coached for the Falcons at some point too.

Love Joe Gibbs but Alex was a POS. That guy's coaching cost more than one player their career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That was back in 03.

If I remember correctly, Alex Gibbs was the Bucs line coach at the time. I think he coached for the Falcons at some point too.

Love Joe Gibbs but Alex was a POS. That guy's coaching cost more than one player their career.

yeah that sounds familiar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jfra78
      Charlotte Hornets Offseason Moves

      By jfra78 · Posted

      Bleacher Report trade and mock has us trading to 9 and picking SG Brayden Burries Charlotte Hornets recieve: Kyrie Irving and No. 9 pick Dallas Mavericks receive: LaMelo Ball, No. 14 pick and No. 18 pick The Hornets just finished their sixth season with Ball. It was only their second with a winning record, their sixth without a playoff trip and the sixth in which someone else paced them in win shares (Kon Knueppel this time around). While they'd surely like to keep building on their second-half momentum, maybe they're just unconvinced that Ball can lead a winning team. Maybe they credit that stretch run less to him and more to the addition of Knueppel, the ascension of Brandon Miller and some out-of-nowhere gains on the defensive end.   Charlotte should be dreaming big right now, and perhaps it believes a steadier hand at point guard is needed to realize that. Or maybe it feels it needs a little more time to bring everything together and thinks that task would be simpler without Ball's money on the books and with a top-10 pick in a loaded draft instead of two selections in the mid-teens.   Either way, this shakeup works. Short-term, a healthy Irving should be far easier to follow than Ball. You may not always know if Irving is playing, but you know what you'll get if he does: elite shotmaking, all-time handles, offensive ingenuity and the ability to work both on and off the ball. He could show this young roster what's required to win for a year or two (he has a $42.4 million player option for 2027-28) or even stick around longer if the partnership proves especially fruitful.   The Hornets also add a building block in Burries, who offers both plug-and-play polish and flashes of shot-creation that hint at star potential. In short, they could better their chances of winning both now and in the future while collecting both the best player in the trade and the highest draft pic
    • LinvilleGorge
      Maybe? Maybe....?

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      I'd hire him in a heartbeat. Hell if he wanted the job, I'd have Canales packing his poo right now and I don't dislike Canales. It's just that firing a 106-58 coach is crazy work. That's a 65% winning percentage. That's the equivalent of averaging 11 wins a season. That's incomprehensible for a fanbase That's never experienced back to back winning seaons.
    • Stumpy
      26 first goal playoff thread

      By Stumpy · Posted

      Stankyboi
×
×
  • Create New...