Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers will target offense in round one


Jeremy Igo
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Hammerin'Cameron34 said:

How butt hurt will you be when we go "target for Cam" in the first round

Then even more butt hurt when we sign Hardy, you'll say "argh argh argh it will be a miracle if that idiot even stays on the field" ... *proceeds to have 15 sack season*

You're not getting just how badly you've been played.

Can't say I'm surprised.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Hammerin'Cameron34 said:

Oh you must be talking about Kelvin Benjamin, somebody who coach Rivera said came to OTA's overweight then mysteriously tore his ACL in training camp

Look at Jeremy Maclin .. tore his ACL once, looked like he was coming back as strong as ever just to tear it one more time .

Thomas Davis stories don't happen every day and if we think Benjamin will be 100% and for a prolonged period of time, we are being blindly optimistic 

I dont even account for what Benjamin could possibly bring to our team this year because he tore his ACL .. when you do that your long-term effectiveness comes into question .

Whew...are you stinking this joint up or what?

Let's just say that we are stuck in 1983, and players never regain the ability to play football after ACL tears....exactly who do you want to add, how would you make it happen, and how does it affect our salary cap?

In addition, are you really happy about taking balls away from our talented young WR corps that we are putting together here?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

And back to the topic, I won't be mad no matter what position we take in round one.

My gut says defense, but I'm thinking more so that Gettleman knows what he's doing and thus I'll be fine with whatever position he drafts at 30.

DT, DE, S, CB, OT absolutely wouldn't shock me.  WR, TE, RB, C/G I wouldn't be as crazy about, but I could see it.

 

Only positions that would surprise me: LB, QB, K, P.  That's about it.

My preference would be pass rusher, pass protector, or lining up Star's or KK's replacement with the thought that we can't sign both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hammerin'Cameron34 said:

Hey, 

If liberal ESPN gave him the opportunity to speak on their station to defend himself ... then how can ESPN or any media criticize a team for signing him on the same side of the coin

The PANTHERS signed Hardy, what an awful franchise

ESPN let Hardy speak on their station, what an awful station ?

ESPN is actually getting quite a bit of backlash for interviewing Hardy, including from some of their own people.

Likewise, plenty of people are criticizing Hardy for coming off like a dumbass who just doesn't get it.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hammerin'Cameron34 said:

So if ESPN can take backlash for letting Hardy speak, just SPEAK, speaking doesn't net sacks .. does letting Hardy speak net anything for ESPN, at all ? It only hurt them apparently

The Panthers can't take a little criticism for letting Hardy play ? At least the criticism would net results, sacks

Like his dominating season last year?

Get over it, kid. Hardy is never going to be a Panther again. Nor should he be.

The team neither needs him nor wants him, so it's not gonna happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hammerin'Cameron34 said:

So wrong, he'll sign here .. if ESPN for fugs sake gave this guy a chance his ex team will

And by ESPN giving him a chance they had a lot more to lose than gain

If the Panthers sign him its a low risk high reward .. by signing him the Panthers wont take any public relations damage .. ESPN ALREADY DID THAT FOR THEM by letting him speak on their station !

And if Hardy is a locker room cancer bring me one incident where he was a problem here ? besides the picture of him in his Bentley going over 100 MPH that rustled everybody here's jimmy's

Do yourself a favor and stop posting, you are out of your league.

 

Also, no follow up on my questions for you?  Who, how, price, etc......Didn't think so.  Just go away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/9/2016 at 10:20 PM, Promethean Forerunner said:

I don't care if he "fits" what we do.

See, therein lies the problem... he DOESN'T fit.  Just because he's a "hard" runner doesn't make him a fit.

Dude has never run a read-option play with a read-option QB in his life.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...