Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We Threw Hardy Under the Bus, but We Just Drafted A Guy With the Same Red Flag


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

And to be clear this wasn't about bringing Hardy back per se, it's illustrating the huddle groupthink at work.  Hardy was written off as a woman beater (bka a career killer) and an idiot (which he may be).  But, he was a damn good player.  He went downhill in Dallas and many rejoiced because they saw it as vindication for letting him go.

Now, we draft a guy under basically the same circumstances that Hardy went through, and those same people sticking up for poor Nicole Holder are now fine with the new addition and it's no big deal because he defended his girlfriend.  Understood.

by "basically under the same circumstances" do you mean "totally different circumstances?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, TheRed said:

I'm sorry, but anyone still clinging to this Greg Hardy poo this far down the road now needs to seriously re-evaluate their life.

The poo is over. He isn't coming back. Grow up.

Believe me, I'm clear on him not ever coming back.

Again, I'm pointing out that we seem to be making rules as we go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

Is putting one's hands, as a male, on a female, resulting in bodily injury not the behavior alleged in both cases?

if the goal is to be as reductionist as possible, than yes, they are the exact same crime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yes, due to a plea deal.  Not certain if they were actually dropped or if the conviction was expunged. 

 

The charges were dropped and the conviction WAS expunged from his record. He says it in the audio file with Dave Gettleman. He even met with the Big Cat and they grilled him while he was here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Is putting one's hands, as a male, on a female, resulting in bodily injury not the behavior alleged in both cases?

 

1 minute ago, PhillyB said:

if the goal is to be as reductionist as possible, than yes, they are the exact same crime.

One is taking an extra cookie from the sample box at Harris Teeter and the other is robbing a bank. 

Essentially the same thing because it results in lost assets for both companies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, Kuhn and Philly, how many times have you pushed a female down to the ground by the throat?

So, we're accepting this as commonplace and acceptable now?

I'm not saying people don't make mistakes, but this sliding scale of morality has become heavily greased tonight, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Okay, Kuhn and Philly, how many times have you pushed a female down to the ground by the throat?

So, we're accepting this as commonplace and acceptable now?

I'm not saying people don't make mistakes, but this sliding scale of morality has become heavily greased tonight, lol.

you just shifted the goalposts by a country mile pd. we aren't necessarily arguing that it's acceptable, but that they're not the same thing. you can parse from there, but framing it as the exact same thing rather than differing degrees is a losing strategy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i know this is.  crazy idea, but maybe.....just MAYBE the team/FO was tired of hardy's act before the whole DV thing came out and that was the last straw  and if that wasn't the last straw then maybe it was what hardy did after all the decisions were made that made them go, "ok....we're done here."

and maybe they saw something in this young kid's attitude  characterthey didnt see in hardy, which was a desire and ability to grow up/mature after his incident.

 

just maybe.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

also, its likely the panthers didnt throw him under a bus ( i mean they paid him $15mil to sit at home) but they got tired of him running out in front of buses and thought it just wasn't worth the expense.

either way, the team got tired of him and let him be someone else's expensive headache. by the long throng of possible suitors (or lack thereof) really bobody wants that headache.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it helps that Bryce and Tmac worked out a bit this off-season before the draft and are familiar with each other's game from way back.  Sure Bryce put in a good word for him to the coaching crew ahead of time That california connection goin' work, I hope
    • Sign but make it mostly incentive driven contract
    • My biggest problem is I think the players he likes don't really work in the modern NFL.  You mentioned the wr room being a lot better, is it?  It has the potential to be.   Last year when we traded up to get Legette, they said they traded up to take him specifically because he was a true X receiver.   Now this year they take TMac because they say he is and that XL was out of posisition last year.  Im not sold on Tmac yet just like I wasn't sold on XL last year.  If TMac isn't a lot better than last XL was last season then that's back to back first rounders in one position that would still need a huge amount of work.  Hopefully Tmac is what everyone seems to think he will be, I'm just not so sure, but them declaring XL was a true X receiver after the draft last year and what they're saying now should at least give you pause about their receivers evaluation because it means they definitely made a mistake one way or another.
×
×
  • Create New...