Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We Threw Hardy Under the Bus, but We Just Drafted A Guy With the Same Red Flag


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

And to be clear this wasn't about bringing Hardy back per se, it's illustrating the huddle groupthink at work.  Hardy was written off as a woman beater (bka a career killer) and an idiot (which he may be).  But, he was a damn good player.  He went downhill in Dallas and many rejoiced because they saw it as vindication for letting him go.

Now, we draft a guy under basically the same circumstances that Hardy went through, and those same people sticking up for poor Nicole Holder are now fine with the new addition and it's no big deal because he defended his girlfriend.  Understood.

by "basically under the same circumstances" do you mean "totally different circumstances?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, TheRed said:

I'm sorry, but anyone still clinging to this Greg Hardy poo this far down the road now needs to seriously re-evaluate their life.

The poo is over. He isn't coming back. Grow up.

Believe me, I'm clear on him not ever coming back.

Again, I'm pointing out that we seem to be making rules as we go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

Is putting one's hands, as a male, on a female, resulting in bodily injury not the behavior alleged in both cases?

if the goal is to be as reductionist as possible, than yes, they are the exact same crime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yes, due to a plea deal.  Not certain if they were actually dropped or if the conviction was expunged. 

 

The charges were dropped and the conviction WAS expunged from his record. He says it in the audio file with Dave Gettleman. He even met with the Big Cat and they grilled him while he was here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Is putting one's hands, as a male, on a female, resulting in bodily injury not the behavior alleged in both cases?

 

1 minute ago, PhillyB said:

if the goal is to be as reductionist as possible, than yes, they are the exact same crime.

One is taking an extra cookie from the sample box at Harris Teeter and the other is robbing a bank. 

Essentially the same thing because it results in lost assets for both companies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, Kuhn and Philly, how many times have you pushed a female down to the ground by the throat?

So, we're accepting this as commonplace and acceptable now?

I'm not saying people don't make mistakes, but this sliding scale of morality has become heavily greased tonight, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Okay, Kuhn and Philly, how many times have you pushed a female down to the ground by the throat?

So, we're accepting this as commonplace and acceptable now?

I'm not saying people don't make mistakes, but this sliding scale of morality has become heavily greased tonight, lol.

you just shifted the goalposts by a country mile pd. we aren't necessarily arguing that it's acceptable, but that they're not the same thing. you can parse from there, but framing it as the exact same thing rather than differing degrees is a losing strategy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i know this is.  crazy idea, but maybe.....just MAYBE the team/FO was tired of hardy's act before the whole DV thing came out and that was the last straw  and if that wasn't the last straw then maybe it was what hardy did after all the decisions were made that made them go, "ok....we're done here."

and maybe they saw something in this young kid's attitude  characterthey didnt see in hardy, which was a desire and ability to grow up/mature after his incident.

 

just maybe.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

also, its likely the panthers didnt throw him under a bus ( i mean they paid him $15mil to sit at home) but they got tired of him running out in front of buses and thought it just wasn't worth the expense.

either way, the team got tired of him and let him be someone else's expensive headache. by the long throng of possible suitors (or lack thereof) really bobody wants that headache.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...