Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Alright, post your All-Time Top 10 now that Bron won his third. 3/7


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, MichaelNewtonII said:

You have your opinion, I have mine. We'll see what the consensus is at the end of LeBrons career, he's only 31 people seem to forget

31 without a consistent jumper=trouble.  Especially when father time catches up with him.  You talk to me when your boy gets at least 5 rings, then we can have a conversation.  Until then, LeBron is Top 10, maybe Top 5, but that's as far as it goes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 without a consistent jumper=trouble.  Especially when father time catches up with him.  You talk to me when your boy gets at least 5 rings, then we can have a conversation.  Until then, LeBron is Top 10, maybe Top 5, but that's as far as it goes.  

We'll talk again about this in 2-3 years. Kyrie is only gonna get better too and Love will be gone and replaced with a better fit. If LeBron has a good team around him he's going to continue to go to the finals every year. No one in the east is even close

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MichaelNewtonII said:

We'll talk again about this in 2-3 years. Kyrie is only gonna get better too and Love will be gone and replaced with a better fit. If LeBron has a good team around him he's going to continue to go to the finals every year

Agreed, because the East is hot garbage.  

Unless Durant comes over to the East, or another Superstar emerges, I won't argue with your statement.  

But, lookout for OKC, if they stay healthy, LeBron and Kyrie would have massive issues with Durant and Westbrook.  

Unlike GS, they also have big men that aren't completely useless.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comparing all time is really pointless, the NBA ebbs and flows. MJ would be a different player (skillset) if he played in today's league just like Steph Curry would be a different player in the 90s. 

In all honesty the league was very watered down up until about the 2000s as well, the average NBA player is leagues better than they were even in the 90s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Omega Atrocity said:

Comparing all time is really pointless, the NBA ebbs and flows. MJ would be a different player (skillset) if he played in today's league just like Steph Curry would be a different player in the 90s. 

In all honesty the league was very watered down up until about the 2000s as well, the average NBA player is leagues better than they were even in the 90s.

Yeah, watered down.  Lets see, how many certified Hall of Famers are in the League now?  Hmmmm, 1 maybe 2-3?  

And then we look at Jordans era in the 90's which was full of Hall of Famers, but yes, the league was watered down then.

You cannot make this poo up.  How old are these fuging kids?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...