Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Alright, post your All-Time Top 10 now that Bron won his third. 3/7


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, MichaelNewtonII said:

You have your opinion, I have mine. We'll see what the consensus is at the end of LeBrons career, he's only 31 people seem to forget

31 without a consistent jumper=trouble.  Especially when father time catches up with him.  You talk to me when your boy gets at least 5 rings, then we can have a conversation.  Until then, LeBron is Top 10, maybe Top 5, but that's as far as it goes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 without a consistent jumper=trouble.  Especially when father time catches up with him.  You talk to me when your boy gets at least 5 rings, then we can have a conversation.  Until then, LeBron is Top 10, maybe Top 5, but that's as far as it goes.  

We'll talk again about this in 2-3 years. Kyrie is only gonna get better too and Love will be gone and replaced with a better fit. If LeBron has a good team around him he's going to continue to go to the finals every year. No one in the east is even close

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MichaelNewtonII said:

We'll talk again about this in 2-3 years. Kyrie is only gonna get better too and Love will be gone and replaced with a better fit. If LeBron has a good team around him he's going to continue to go to the finals every year

Agreed, because the East is hot garbage.  

Unless Durant comes over to the East, or another Superstar emerges, I won't argue with your statement.  

But, lookout for OKC, if they stay healthy, LeBron and Kyrie would have massive issues with Durant and Westbrook.  

Unlike GS, they also have big men that aren't completely useless.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comparing all time is really pointless, the NBA ebbs and flows. MJ would be a different player (skillset) if he played in today's league just like Steph Curry would be a different player in the 90s. 

In all honesty the league was very watered down up until about the 2000s as well, the average NBA player is leagues better than they were even in the 90s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Omega Atrocity said:

Comparing all time is really pointless, the NBA ebbs and flows. MJ would be a different player (skillset) if he played in today's league just like Steph Curry would be a different player in the 90s. 

In all honesty the league was very watered down up until about the 2000s as well, the average NBA player is leagues better than they were even in the 90s.

Yeah, watered down.  Lets see, how many certified Hall of Famers are in the League now?  Hmmmm, 1 maybe 2-3?  

And then we look at Jordans era in the 90's which was full of Hall of Famers, but yes, the league was watered down then.

You cannot make this poo up.  How old are these fuging kids?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...