Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Six changes at Bank of America Stadium this season


Ron Burgandy

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

This poo is getting anoying. Im all pro i shouldnt have to see spam threads

 

 

yes it is spam. Ive know about these upgrades for months

 

what other eedundant and pointless thread is going to show up in 10 minutes? 

 

image.jpeg

It isn't any more annoying than you sig.

I actually learned something new from that article. It appears from this that the $8.50 all you can drink soda option is all that will be available

Quote

▪ Soda changes: As part of the renovations to the stadium’s 500-level, the team removed all pourable drinks from the fixed concession stands because they slow down lines by taking up a lot of space. Now fans will buy a cup at the concession stands and fill the drinks themselves at all-you-can-drink Pepsi stands. The down side? All-you-can-drink cups are $8.50. Other levels do not yet have access to the all-you-can-drink option, so they are $6.50 for a 32-oz cup, said Scott Paul, executive director of stadium operations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Huddler said:

This poo is getting anoying. Im all pro i shouldnt have to see spam threads

 

 

yes it is spam. Ive know about these upgrades for months

 

what other eedundant and pointless thread is going to show up in 10 minutes? 

 

image.jpeg

I was going to say the same thing in another thread, but then I realized it was a story about helping people out by recycling cans and I didn't want to look like a douche.  I'd literally rather read a PU thread.  At least that provided entertainment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If his seat was hot enough for him to be fired 6 games in then you should've just fired him when you made the decision to draft a QB #1 overall. I don't think you go from "this is definitely our guy" to "you're fired in 6 games". Seems like there would be had to have been doubts going in and that's not a recipe for success for a rookie QB.
    • I like to use the analogy that a high draft pick QB is like a new supercar. Great to have one except too often, one forgets that they are high maintenance. A bad team secures their car under a cheap tent, puts regular gas in the tank, services it at Pep Boys, and then blames the car for not working properly and proceeds to get another one.  At the least, Ward getting sacked 25 times already is a massive red flag. If you can't protect your rookie QB, you do not put him out there. Otherwise, it's taking your supercar and immediately spinning it right into a tree. A few survive that rough of a start. Most do not.
    • I don't think there's any one size fits all answer. I think you play the rookie when A) you think he's ready and B) you think there's a reasonable expectation that the overall situation provides him an opportunity to be successful, not necessarily in terms of wins and losses but just in terms of giving him a fighting chance with surrounding talent. If you rush either one it's probably not gonna be pretty.
×
×
  • Create New...