Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A look at past Panther dress rehearsals and how we did that season


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

2016: Loss to the Patriots

2015: Loss to the Patriots, went 15-1 and made the Super Bowl

2014: Loss to the Patriots, won division title and a playoff game

2013: Beat the Ravens, went 12-4

2012: Beat the Jets, went 7-9

2011: Loss to the Bengals, went 6-10

2010: Beat the Titans, went 2-14

2009: Loss to the Ravens, went 8-8

2008: Beat the Redskins, went 12-4

2007: Loss to the Patriots, went 7-9

2006: Beat the Dolphins, went 8-8

2005: Beat the Browns, went 11-5

2004: Beat the Patriots, went 7-9

2003: Beat the Packers, went 11-5 and made the Super Bowl

2002: Loss to the Patriots, went 7-9

2001: Beat the Ravens, went 1-15

2000: Loss to the Ravens, went 7-9

1999: Loss to the Ravens, went 8-8

1998: Loss to the Vikings, went 4-12

1997: Loss to the Chiefs, went 7-9

1996: Loss to the Bills, went 12-4

1995: Loss to the 49ers, went 7-9

 

So what does this tell us boys and girls? It tells us that there is zero correlation between how these dress rehearsals go and how we play that season. So if you're sitting there all worried at how bad we looked last night, go outside and enjoy one of the last Saturdays of the summer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scores don't ofte tell the story of a preseason game though. I wonder how things looked at halftime of each of those games. Also, I wonder if something could be gleaned by the quality of play exhibited by the starters.

Not trying to argue or say that last night was significant - I tend to agree that we have no idea what the staff is looking for during preseason and that most of what we see should be taken with significant grains of salt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KSpan said:

Scores don't ofte tell the story of a preseason game though. I wonder how things looked at halftime of each of those games. Also, I wonder if something could be gleaned by the quality of play exhibited by the starters.

Not trying to argue or say that last night was significant - I tend to agree that we have no idea what the staff is looking for during preseason and that most of what we see should be taken with significant grains of salt.

Yeah ending scores don't mean poo. Gotta look at things in context or situationally. I did a little write up in the "are you worried thread" there was a lot of overreaction last night, people were most likely intoxicated and raging in the game day threads. I sat down, watched the game last night had a pint of beer knowing we got slaughtered beforehand. There are tons of positives and some context to things we did situationally. There's also some very concerning stuff. But if we turn out to have a losing record this year I would be shocked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

I sat down, watched the game last night had a pint of beer knowing we got slaughtered beforehand. There are tons of positives and some context to things we did situationally.

good idea.  Once you take the emotion and the score out of it, I'm sure there's some interesting stuff to look at.  I'm hoping to find time to go back and watch the game on gamepass and look more closely at our Oline and Dline.  I find when watching the game live at the stadium, it's too easy to just watch the ball and miss a lot of stuff at the line of scrimmage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

So what does this tell us boys and girls? It tells us that there is zero correlation between how these dress rehearsals go and how we play that season. So if you're sitting there all worried at how bad we looked last night, go outside and enjoy one of the last Saturdays of the summer.

Gtfo with your logic and facts and shizz! Can't you let people freak out for no reason in peace?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

doesn't matter about the final score , last season we dominated brady early on with 2 intos , even though our offense dropped everything like they did this time. i watched the first quarter over and there was so many times we had receivers open underneath and cam just threw it deep . if it was during the season i think he would take the easy 5 yard gains, also were not going to run our big play actions which is the best when cam rolls out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best preseason game I ever witnessed from the panthers was that Washington game in 2008.  Man, did I ever have fun watching that game!  It was the introduction of "Double Trouble", and there were plenty of wow plays that happened in it. (Steve Smith picking up a fumble to score a touchdown, and Peppers sacking both Chris Samuels and Jason Campbell)  As exciting as Cam can be, and boy can he be exciting to watch, I doubt I will ever see an entertaining and dominate performance as I witnessed that night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To understand why a player with all the tools to be successful in the NFL would bust is remarkably difficult.  While Isaiah Simmons has had a disappointing career to this point, there is a reason he is back in Carolina.  Yes, special teams are important and he does well in that role.  My intent is to examine in what situations he has been successful and develop a theory about the reason he might have experienced success in some capacity vs. the times he has flopped.  Is he a CB?  A Safety?  A LB?  An Edge?  No.  He has been all of them at some point and has yet to settle into a position.  I think the Panthers will do the same thing.  I think I know (besides special teams) how they might use him effectively on defense.  First, think of Simmons as a unicorn. Create a position that he does not have to fit into, but one that fits into his skill sets.  I think we need to designate him as our Big Nickel, and then we need to modify that position into something of a rover, for lack of a better term.  He is a hybrid--but lets not make him the hybrid, let's make the position the hybrid.  Isaiah Simmons has been most effective in the NFL as a Big Nickel and on special teams, specifically in sub-packages where he can leverage his elite speed (4.39 40-yard dash) without the constant physical demands of a traditional linebacker.  A big nickel is a third safety, designed to match up with the big TEs, basically, and provide better run support.   Based on what I have read, Simmons is slowed when he has to know the Xs and Os and the position is focused on complex interpretations that may require adjustments in certain situations, etc.  He excels in special teams, for example, because he is turned loose and he simple reacts to what he sees in front of him, it seems.   I think the Panthers may create a big nickel role that turns him loose on defense.       Simmons has been in the league for about 6 years and has been issued five playbooks.  His position has shifted in an effort to find where he could best fit in.  Getting back to basics, here is a chart that demonstrates how much more effective he was as a big nickel than a traditional LB, that required more reading blocking and run game schemes:     Last season, Ransom was the big nickel, the Panthers are high on him and not looking to replace him by any means.  It is my theory that Ransom will be used alongside Moehrig in some situations.  He can also provide depth behind Moehrig.  It is also my opinion that Simmons may not be the ideal fit for every situation involving the big nickel.  Simmons could be used, for example, as a blitzing big nickel who can cover the flat and stuff the run, while Ransom may be the better lock-down TE coverage guy--I dunno.  But I see Simmons playing a bigger role on D.   Here is a comparison between Ransom and Simmons: Lathan Ransom: A 2025 fourth-round pick, he is viewed as a starter candidate to provide security opposite safety Tre'von Moehrig, with the Panthers high on his potential. Isaiah Simmons: Recently re-signed (March 2026), Simmons has thrived as a special teams ace but is considered a prime candidate to develop into a big nickel linebacker/safety hybrid due to his unique versatility. Context: The Panthers' defense under Ejiro Evero requires safety depth, and both players bring different strengths to that position group. Throw in Nick Scott, a pure free safety who just signed, it is starting to get a bit clearer.  Does this mean we will not draft a S?  Not at all.  Who do we have to give depth at FS?  Let's hope its Scott. It is my view that Simmons needs to find one or two things he does well on this defense and focus on that and not everything else.  What are his natural talents (6'4" 238 and runs sub 4.4--who does that?  Can you not make that work for you?)  This tells me the problem is mental.  Too many cooks in the kitchen.  Instead of asking him to do everything behind the DL, let's get him to do one thing that aligns with his skill set and history of success.  A situational big nickel/rover seems to be a fit.    
    • Who had us getting arguably the best receiver in the draft last April? Dan believes in sticking with his board. That's what the Panthers will do. It's that simple.
×
×
  • Create New...