Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Lucas gets cut, this is why


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I was sitting here reading the latest piece from Bryan Strickland on our Tight Ends   and was pleasantly surprised to see Marcus Lucas getting some "air time." Yeah, it's a little fluffery, but could it be a sign that maybe the tide is turning for the guy to finally catch on? Who knows? But here is what the TE coach, Pete Hoener, had to say:

 
"He's made great progress. Versus a year ago, he's getting closer," Hoener said. "His biggest thing is transitioning over into all the blocking and pass protections and everything you have to do to be a complete tight end because we don't have specialty players."

Strickland also quoted Hoener on Olsen and Dickson doing a "great" job.

Blocking and assignments are what it's going to come down to with Lucas. And even though some of you may be thinking that it's not like Ed Dickson is the best blocker---the complete TE either---I suppose that sometimes coaches are just comfortable with the status quo, all things being equal.

As for me, all things aren't equal, and sometimes you have to go with the younger, hungrier guy that has more upside. But, of course, if Lucas is just lost out there---and that would be a whole lot easier for the coaches who know exactly what they're looking at---then I can see why he'd be getting his visit from the Turk, yet again.

For his sake, and the improvement of the team, I hope that he has learned enough to justify sticking around.

Coach Hoener also gives a few words on Simonson, Sandland  and Wallace.

Can you see what the tea leaves are saying?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Hogmolliesmaht said:

Any TE not named Olsen is going to be primarily a blocker. People keep putting Dickson down because he doesn't catch a lot of passes, but that's not really his job in this offense.

I'm a big believer that if you show the coaches or the QB that you are a legit play maker at a skill position, they will find ways to get you the ball. 

There's an old saying that "Cards come to card players." Well, the ball comes to ball players as well. Sure, the backup tight end's job is to primarily block, but secondarily it is to make more than a couple of memorable catches per year.

 

 

Remember Shockey?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I'm a big believer that if you show the coaches or the QB that you are a legit play maker at a skill position, they will find ways to get you the ball. 

There's an old saying that "Cards come to card players." Well, the ball comes to ball players as well. Sure, the backup tight end's job is to primarily block, but secondarily it is to make more than a couple of memorable catches per year.

 

 

Remember Shockey?

Shockey has nothing to do with the 2016 Panthers. That was a different offense and we only had one decent WR when he was here. Our TE coach has said the same thing I just did. Even Olsen has to be a blocker first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Hogmolliesmaht said:

Shockey has nothing to do with the 2016 Panthers. That was a different offense and we only had one decent WR when he was here. Our TE coach has said the same thing I just did. Even Olsen has to be a blocker first.

Blocking first doesn't preclude TEs from making catches. But since you are so locked in on the blocking aspect, let me hip you to something.

Quote

 

PFF grade (position rank): -16.1 (73rd)
2015 salary cap hit: $1.5 million

The Panthers couldn’t field premier talent at wide receiver this year after Kelvin Benjamin tore his ACL in training camp, so the Panthers often used Dickson, a backup tight end, in jumbo sets alongside first-stringer Greg Olsen.

Unfortunately, Dickson ended up grading out as the worst blocker at his position this season, his fourth consecutive year with a negative outlook in that regard from Pro Football Focus. He also failed to move the needle in Carolina’s aerial attack, gaining just 7.1 yards per reception, the second-lowest mark among tight ends with at least 25 targets

 

http://wtop.com/nfl/2016/01/the-least-valuable-player-of-every-nfl-team-in-2015/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Blocking first doesn't preclude TEs from making catches. But since you are so locked in on the blocking aspect, let me hip you to something.

http://wtop.com/nfl/2016/01/the-least-valuable-player-of-every-nfl-team-in-2015/

PFF is not without it's own flaws, but OK. Look, I'm pulling for Lucas to make it too but he has to know the offense like the back of his hand in order to supplant Dickson. I don't think the Panthers coaching staff is stupid, so obviously Dickson has been doing something right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KillerKat said:

Dickson sucks dick at blocking. So Idk why all this "all our TEs have to block" mess keeps being regurgitated.

 

26 minutes ago, Floppin said:

Both Olsen and Dickson suck balls at blocking if we're being perfectly honest here.

Well, I didn't want to bring those points up because I think that I've said enough, but it's not like I wasn't thinking it. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Dickson barely got any snaps last season, and the main reason Dickson is used as a blocker is cause he can't catch.

 

 

What are you talking about? Dickson played plenty of snaps. I'll be fine if they cut him, but he's not as easy to replace as some of you think. If he was, he would have already been gone by now. What does the coaching staff know though right? They only fielded the #1 offense in the league last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Hogmolliesmaht said:

What are you talking about? Dickson played plenty of snaps. I'll be fine if they cut him, but he's not as easy to replace as some of you think. If he was, he would have already been gone by now. What does the coaching staff know though right? They only fielded the #1 offense in the league last year.

This is the worst logic regurgitated on this board "the coaching staff knows more than you, so don't question any of their moves". Appeareantly the coaching staff and front office is off limits and cannot be criticize. I mean look at our SB cabinet, it speaks for itself.

 

 Dickson is not easy to replace? Yet ravens fans don't seem to miss him much, hardly any other team seemed to be interested in Dickson when he was a FA. But I guess his 2 TD did made all the difference in our number 1 offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...