Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You a talker or a texter?


pstall

Recommended Posts

I have gotten to the point now i will just text you. It's quick, concise and to the point . If you call and don't leave a vm i don't bother replying. You do leave a vm then i text my answer.  Lol

I got friends who after 2 texts just have to call and I'm like come on man.

What says the Huddle?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definite texter. Talking? With my phone? What's that about? 

That would be like putting a clock on your phone so you don't have to look at a wrist watch, then making smart watches for your wrist so you don't have to look at your phone. It's insanity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Old school here. I prefer talking. I have seen way too many people get upset by text messages that were meant to be funny but sarcasm doesn't come across a text very well sometimes. I also know of people who will say something blatantly mean on text and when called out on it they go with "I was just kidding" or something similar. I do text some but if the conversation goes much beyond just giving facts or info I dial the number just so everything is clear. If that person doesn't pick up or worse, tries to continue texting, they get no reply from me until they call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, pstall said:

Unless I'm walking someone thru removing a brain tumor or landing a plane because the pilot passed out,  I don't see what can be so hard to understand that we need a table for 5 and to order me a Copper before I get there.

Alot easier to text a aircraft then talking on the radio. Less distracting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...