Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scouts Inc.- Panthers Versus Cowboys


KatsAzz

Recommended Posts

Unbiased POV

QB Dal

RB Car

WR Car (Smith is better than Williams, Moose is even, after then adv Dal)

TE Dal

OL Even

DL Dal

LB Dal (but VERY close)

DB Dal

ST Dal They have better returners, you have a better kicker, but judging by the punt block- you guys have problems elsewhere on ST

Coaching- Car

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QB: both are a choke waiting to happen. he aint much but at crunch time i'd rather have delhomme. in a perfect world i wouldn't have either but jake is the lesser of two evils.

RB: even.

WR panthers. smith>royw. moose>crayton other guys< austin

OL tie. we get the edge on class because we don't have flozer adams having to resort to tripping people to keep romo upright.

DL tie. both underperforming.

LB tie. (how many sacks they got this year?) both underperforming.

DB tie. both suck.

ST cowboys...aint saying much, though.

TE: cowboys

coach: tie

owner: panthers by a mile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread makes me think of all the people who walk up to me at work and say "Where do I log in?" while they are standing right in front of the computer with the giant sign saying "Log in Here."

Reminds me of the scene from Clerks where he talks about the retarded people coming into the video store asking where the new movies are, while standing in front of a huge "NEW MOVIES HERE" sign.

"Oooh look, mini-trucker magazine." :leaving:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm if we go by the first two games of the season, all their positions have outperformed us, especially offensively. Their line has opened holes and protected their QB, ours hasnt. That definitely contributes to why their RB's production is so high. Their QB only has three ints compared to our 6, and gotten more WR production, partly b/c of Romo. Smith will be the best WR on the field, but dont discredit RW, and their depth behind our 1's is better. TE not even worth mentioning, Witten may be the most dominating player on the field unless we decide to cover him. Their defense hasnt been great, no sacks as a matter of fact, but still better than ours. But we know they have a sack machine in Ware, a matter of time before they start drilling people, and our luck... They just lost, we seem to be playing teams at the worse times, while Saints are getting break after break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...