Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Future of Defense?


jramsey4

Recommended Posts

I was gonna say even the Williams Wall would be extremely exhausted by the 3rd Q trying to occupy two guys every play. It's a very real formation on passing downs, more likely an CB or S rather than the fifth LB.

Now that is a concern I agree with. Easiest way to combat this is a good rotation but it would be very hard to keep three good NT, but not impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the reason why more teams are going to a 3-4 is because there is a serious shortage of premier DTs. Now your defense is putting even more importance on having not one but two monster NTs along with solid rotational guys. Besides the obvious fact that it would give up huge YPC to average RBs, it's completely unworkable personnel wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the reason why more teams are going to a 3-4 is because there is a serious shortage of premier DTs. Now your defense is putting even more importance on having not one but two monster DTs. Besides the obvious fact that it would give up huge YPC to an average RB, it's completely unworkable personnel wise.

hate to burst your bubble but the hardest position to find in the entire game is a 3-4 NT.

and for every green bay switching to a 3-4 there's a New England switching to a 4-3

hell san diego is switching to a 4-3 because williams is down

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hate to burst your bubble but the hardest position to find in the entire game is a 3-4 NT.

and for every green bay switching to a 3-4 there's a New England switching to a 4-3

hell san diego is switching to a 4-3 because williams is down

The reason the Pats are switching to the 4-3 is the only reason I don't mind still using it, the talent is easier to come by because of the success of the 3-4. More and more guys that were great in the 4-3 find them selves unemployed because they can't make it in the 3-4 (look at everyones favorite off-season DT to speculate about getting, Correy Williams).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you got an elephant you could play a 1-7

WHERE IS IT AGAINST THE RULES SHOW ME

I have seen the patriots have quite a bit have success using a front where there are no down lineman. So I guess only Belichick can get creative and new defense and have it be successful. Please. Every new scheme from 3-4 to the wildcat got there routes from someone creative trying to get a competitive edge. And before you misconstrue my trying to think outside the box as thinking I can coach in the NFL I assure you I have no such disillusions. But I have always prided myself as being a creative person in all approaches to life, I just wish Fox was the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not bad.

I think 3-4 is increasing not just because of the pass but the advent of the spread and that old wildcat.

The zone blitz is there to maybe counter teams that do a quick drop ala West Coast.

Also, as someone mentioned with just 2 DT's they would wear down.

This is why the RB by committee is so big. Wearing your opponent down.

Because there isn't a giant chasm of talent/speed team by team you have to out scheme the other team.

Raiders for example. They allegedly have the all world DB Ashoumonga(i butchered his name and too tired to search).

Ok. So you have the great one back there. How is that translating to wins?

The other trend is where your money is concentrated in the salary cap.

The NFL front offices, the good ones anyway, have figured out avg years per spot and the drop off point on production and where to load up on contracts and where to let go.

That alone causes schemes to be much different than just signing the best per spot.

Good work though OP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen the patriots have quite a bit have success using a front where there are no down lineman. So I guess only Belichick can get creative and new defense and have it be successful. Please. Every new scheme from 3-4 to the wildcat got there routes from someone creative trying to get a competitive edge. And before you misconstrue my trying to think outside the box as thinking I can coach in the NFL I assure you I have no such disillusions. But I have always prided myself as being a creative person in all approaches to life, I just wish Fox was the same.

ramsey this formation is just too impractical to apply to the NFL.

5 linebackers and two linemen. A two TE set would destroy this easily with the run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It wasn’t completely his fault, but outside of two throws and one or two scrambles he didn’t do much to help. His accuracy was all over the place, numerous passes that were placed poorly and didn’t give the receiver a good chance to catch the ball or do anything with it after. He also continues to display terrible pocket awareness. Even the sacks could have been avoided, they weren’t immediate like the pressure we got on Shough at times. Bryce just often has no feel for pressure and stands there waiting to get sacked after numerous seconds have passed. 
    • I really fuging hate this era in so many ways.  I look at those Adin Ross and Neon kids, and I just wonder why tf are they famous?  Why would anyone be desperate enough to gain THAT audience that they’d risk money, career, disciplinary action to go up there and associate with those fuging dweebs?  And back in my day, racist peers got their ass beat.  And not endorsing or approving bully culture, but checks and balances and all…  had those two been bullied, or at the very least humbled, they wouldn’t be famous and glorified for being the fuging idiots they are now.  It seriously pisses me off… they both have done and said multiple, openly racist stuff and major media keeps pushing them, talking about them, and propping them up… and then dummies like Puka who don’t need the platform or exposure lend their celebrity to them.  fuging idiot… and even the other streamers, I don’t get - Speed, Kai…  I don’t understand making nobodies famous at all, but there is at least entertainment value to some degree there, and I could see how young, impressionable kids would find them something to aspire to (sadly), or view as “cool.”  But Ross and Neon?  They’re just shitty, shitty nerds with big ass mouths. I’ve went back recently and watched some classics (in two very different eras and categories 😂)  like Robocop and Idiocracy.  And what I find fascinating is how both movies illustrate how stupid society became by showing what the citizenry is entertained by.  In both, society became anti-intellectual and the citizenry were entertained by lowest denominator, primal-type absurdity - poo like, “Ouch! My Balls!”  Or on Robocop, a guy is a watching a show where they are smashing cakes on ladies’ breasts and then a guy says a line as the camera zooms in like, “I’d buy that for a dollar!” and the audience thinks it’s hilarious.  That’s where I feel like we are now.  Like who watches that clip with Puka and thinks any of that poo is funny or cool?  If I was Puka, I’d honestly be wondering why tf I’m hanging out with these beta ass, racist, cretin ass weirdos.
    • 7 wins this year and some of those against really good teams and yall think Canales might get fired? Lol Good luck getting a better coach in here if that happens.  
×
×
  • Create New...