Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why are slow starts so bad for Panthers?


Steve_Smith_Sr.

Recommended Posts

Over and over again I hear that we need fast starts.  Sure, it's nice to jump out to an early lead as it takes pressure off and lets the play calling be more aggressive - but doesn't EVERY team want to jump out to an early lead????

"We're not built to come from behind" - what the hell does that even mean?  I understand it this year, but even last year I heard that.  It's crap.  Every team has the ability to make plays on defense, put the ball back into the offenses hands and score more points than the opponent.  This isn't rocket surgery.

Are we so emotionally fragile that we MUST jump out to an early lead so we can kick it into neutral and let the other team come roaring back for a last minute nail biter?  That's pretty much what it feels like.

This has bugged me for a long time, not just this season... and I think it's a really lame excuse.  If you get down early, step up and keep fighting.  Do you EVER count the Steelers out when they're down?  How about the Patriots, or the Seahawks?  Nope.  I expect them to come back, and they usually do.  When we're down - you can just feel the game slipping away.

Does anyone else feel this is just a cop out for a team that has a hard time believing in itself?

Feel free to flame me - I'll just reply with fantastic .gif's of Cartman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers have historically, no matter the coach, have let up on the gas. Why? I don't know. Maybe it's a JR thing with not embarrassing the other team and the precious NFL shield at the 50. Good sportsmanship and all... but it's getting old. I want a team that wil stomp the sh!t out of you and not care that your feeling are hurt. 

obligatory video

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Salisburysean98 said:

If we are down by 21 period. We won't come back. I could just sense it as I sat and watched the game, ultimately the Saints were going to win. I knew that on the final drive,  the saints would do as the patriots did just like in Superbowl 38.

I felt the same way Sunday, but mostly because the defense hadn't done anything to make you believe the Saints wouldn't score 100 points. 

Panthers' offense was never a really a question. Not against the Saints defense anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We haven't been good at adapting really, and it goes all the way back to Fox as well.   We'll have a gameplan and sometimes it works but when it doesn't, it's usually game over.   I think we just get outcoached, honestly.  With Rivera, it's like the league figures out what he's doing every other year but he can't adapt in the same year (personnel, etc, idk).   I think Rivera is a good coach before gameday but terrible on gameday.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

We haven't been good at adapting really, and it goes all the way back to Fox as well.   We'll have a gameplan and sometimes it works but when it doesn't, it's usually game over.   I think we just get outcoached, honestly.  With Rivera, it's like the league figures out what he's doing every other year but he can't adapt in the same year (personnel, etc, idk).   I think Rivera is a good coach before gameday but terrible on gameday.   

I agree, playcalling has always been iffy. But that's not directly Ron's fault. Indirectly, yes he's responsible for every call on every play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dugger would cost $23.5 million in dead money if they cut him. Sounds like a trade is the only option. I'm more concerned about LB at this point.
    • I am not the one pitching a fit, frank. Again, I don't agree with this notion that Dalton is some washed up scrub. He is one of the better backup QB's in the NFL. Despite that....he isn't gonna walk in there and start rattling off wins. Jesus....what backup QB in the NFL right now is?? We. Stink.  A competent backup exists to not immediately sink the ship if he has to play for a few games. Dalton is capable of that. Losing games slightly better or worse than Bryce.  If you want competition for Bryce, WTF are you bitching at all of us for? You think we are David Tepper, Dan Morgan, etc? I don't have any control over the ignorant poo they do.  Sure, it would be great to have invested some resources in a young QB but you also have to be realistic about this roster. It still sucks. We have holes in every possible direction, our depth is a fuging joke and our starters are about as bad. It's genuinely a luxury to be taking a young QB anywhere either than day 3, especially with how weak some of the recent QB drafts have been. And we all know that those day 3 QB's are probably less likely to pan out that some special teams caliber OL/DL/DB/etc.  I don't blame them for not spamming pick after pick at QB because they already have a massive investment in Bryce. That's the fuging business part of the NFL, like it or not. If it doesn't pan out this year, I fully expect a pivot and given track record, I am quite sure it will fail spectacularly as it has almost a dozen fuging times since Cam's arm got nuked.  Welcome to Panthers Nation, buddy.
    • I really hope we keep all 4 + 7 WRs. I like Blackshear, but Etienne has shown that he's more than capable as a returner and RB3. Idk if he's still PS eligible, but that'd be a dub if he could still be stashed.
×
×
  • Create New...