Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Daryl Worley vs. Michael Crabtree


Icege

Recommended Posts

Am I the only one that feels uneasy about the Oakland game not just due to all of the animosity the team is facing in regards to injuries, but also due to this particular match up? I really liked Crabtree in college but thought his diva attitude would prevent him from succeeding like so many other WR divas (sarcasm). He's got great hands and has been having a great year.

I hold my breath whenever Worley looks like he's going to impact a play, unless it's for a 50/50 ball which I'm oddly at ease with him defending. He was wrapping up well at the start of the season, but seems to have taken a few lessons from Tre Boston in how to dive at an opponent's feet instead. I haven't lost my faith in Worley turning into a reliable CB, but at this stage in his development I don't see him doing much against Crabtree other than getting abused.

My sphincter is going to clench every time I see Carr drop back with Worley trailing Crabtree and Boston sprinting to where he was already supposed to be T_T

BUT... who knows? Maybe the DL continues its resurgence and presents the young secondary with less time having to cover. Maybe OAK decides to test Klein or Mayo in the run game or coverage for that matter. I don't see Crabtree burning Worley either, so there's that at least.

I just realized that we're also likely to see Khalil Mack vs. Mike Remmers quite often...

*clenches*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Worley will do fine if we get proper pressure on Carr. There lies the issue however, our pass rush is greatly diminished with Addison out. Then there's the issue with Kuechly being out...

Our defense is in for one wild night. 

Ugh... dude... I completely forgot about Addison being out. A wild night indeed D:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Promethean Forerunner said:

*references his own avatar*

 

 

*wonders when he'll realize he's picking up on his own scent*

I smell great this morning. I showered, put deodorant on, and Spice Bomb cologne.  My scent is phenomenal, sir.  Where are you?  How did you get into the Duke Finance building?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, csx said:

At least their defense is pretty below average.

Work + school + 1yr old have been super greedy with my time and I haven't been able to watch a fraction of the football that I usually get/want to.

What's the deal with their defense? I was under the impression that they had a super solid secondary and a decent pass rush. Is their squad basically just Khalil Mack and Bruce Irvin trying to hold together their front 7? That would be pretty sweet. :3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Icege said:

Work + school + 1yr old have been super greedy with my time and I haven't been able to watch a fraction of the football that I usually get/want to.

What's the deal with their defense? I was under the impression that they had a super solid secondary and a decent pass rush. Is their squad basically just Khalil Mack and Bruce Irvin trying to hold together their front 7? That would be pretty sweet. :3

They are dead last in sacks and qb pressures. 29th in passing yards surrendered per game and 26th in rush yards. basically you could say they suck though somehow they improve to 20th in points

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Icege said:

Work + school + 1yr old have been super greedy with my time and I haven't been able to watch a fraction of the football that I usually get/want to.

What's the deal with their defense? I was under the impression that they had a super solid secondary and a decent pass rush. Is their squad basically just Khalil Mack and Bruce Irvin trying to hold together their front 7? That would be pretty sweet. :3

Work, school, and a kid?  Dude, you're a baller.  I'm going to grad school, plus starting a new job Monday.  And it's rough.  

For the most part, you're correct.  Mack is a beast, but Irvin is overrated.  Their back four is solid, Amerson from NC State has turned into a solid corner.  But besides Mack, their pass rush isn't good.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Icege said:

Am I the only one that feels uneasy about the Oakland game not just due to all of the animosity the team is facing in regards to injuries, but also due to this particular match up? I really liked Crabtree in college but thought his diva attitude would prevent him from succeeding like so many other WR divas (sarcasm). He's got great hands and has been having a great year.

I hold my breath whenever Worley looks like he's going to impact a play, unless it's for a 50/50 ball which I'm oddly at ease with him defending. He was wrapping up well at the start of the season, but seems to have taken a few lessons from Tre Boston in how to dive at an opponent's feet instead. I haven't lost my faith in Worley turning into a reliable CB, but at this stage in his development I don't see him doing much against Crabtree other than getting abused.

My sphincter is going to clench every time I see Carr drop back with Worley trailing Crabtree and Boston sprinting to where he was already supposed to be T_T

BUT... who knows? Maybe the DL continues its resurgence and presents the young secondary with less time having to cover. Maybe OAK decides to test Klein or Mayo in the run game or coverage for that matter. I don't see Crabtree burning Worley either, so there's that at least.

I just realized that we're also likely to see Khalil Mack vs. Mike Remmers quite often...

*clenches*

Tre Boston

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nctarheel0619 said:

But, I was told by the Huddle Worley has gotten better.  We shouldn't have anything to worry about.  Daryl Worley puts up phenomenal tackle numbers.  We'll be okay.  

Well before Worley came along I was told by the huddle Crabtree was done as a WR a couple years ago when he was a FA . 

So you're still right we shouldn't have anything to worry about!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I understand the concerns--he is not P. Sewell or Joe Thomas.  He has technique issues and was not great in the run game and was good in pass protection when UGA did not pass much.  Then there is the immediate need vs long term need perspective.   I did not see Freeland being there-frankly. Here is why:   He has nearly 35" arms and his hands are large (10.5").  He ran a 4.93 40 at the combine.  He is very agile.  His vertical was 33.5".   Physically, he is a freak. He is 21 and he seems very intelligent (coachable). You have to remember, some of these rookies are 24, 25 years old. Freeling is A team player.  His shortcomings are fixable.  Short arms (as with the kids from Utah and Miami) are not fixable.  The Run on OTs began at #9: Fano (picked 10 picks earlier) has 32" arms and his hands are 9".  He did not play in the SEC like Freeling.  Many think the short arms project him to guard. Mauigoa (picked 10th) has 33" arms.  He is a solid player, but his arms make him borderline as a T (they seek 34" and up as ideal)  Kayden Proctor (picked 12th overall) struggled in pass protection and projects by many to RT or G.  Weight management is a concern. So it is possible that Freeling will be the first LT taken who actually plays LT.  (he also has the ability and experience to play RT)  His questions are fixable and not limited to physical limitations.  Here is the question:  If you know that you need a Tackle, and you could choose between all four of these players, who would you pick? I am not sure that Freeling would not be the player I selected if given the opportunity to take any of them.
    • The more I think about this pick the more I like it. The Icky injury might end up being a blessing in disguise for everyone except Icky unfortunately. If Freeling pans out at LT the Panthers have a good player on a rookie contract at a premium position at a time when they’re going to need to potentially pay Bryce for his next contract. Icky was likely going to command a big salary jump for his next contract and now, there’s a strong justification he’s not going to be worth a big money extension until he rehabs and proves he can still play at a high level. Since he’s finishing his rookie deal this season, it will be interesting to see if the Panthers bring him back for the 2027 season. Obviously it’s too early to say and they will probably wait to see how the season pans out with Moton still elite but aging and clearly battling persistent injuries, and they need to see if Freeling can develop into a starter during his rookie year. But ultimately this might have opened up a huge chunk of salary cap for the next 4-5 years. 
    • You read my mind Nastradamus! If Rodriguez is still there I feel like it will be hard to pass on him. And one of these TE we keep drafting have to hit eventually and Delp is just as good as the others.
×
×
  • Create New...