Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Minister of Trolling


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

If you are interested in applying for the Huddle Minister of Trolling position, please do so here.

Responsibilities include singling out trolls, conducting investigations of trolling activities, producing polls of banishment, and acting upon said banishment if justified.

Please state your case as to why you should be selected. I will take the number of pie given to your post into consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 15 said:

why should I be the minister of trolling?

I'm like a PO officer that used to be a gang member back in the day, but has cleaned up and found jesus and now wants to help kids heading down the wrong path and keep them off the streets. I can sniff a troll job out from a mile away. I can name every single troll on this forum, even the ones that some people may think just be "stupid" or "overreacting". they hate me and would fear me having the power to put an end to their BS.

I have the huddle open and am browsing from 8am-5pm PST every day and randomly throughout the weekend. I've been a member here since the server crash. I want to make the huddle great again and build a fugging wall so high that these kids can't climb over it and clog this beautiful forum with terrible content.

vote for me:

giphy.gif 

raw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

I would nominate a troll for this job.

Now this I can get along with.  Can we give Football Lives Matter this position?  

He would ban the constant "sunshine pumpers" that literally make no sense when they type.  "We have a great secondary."  "Worley has been great recently."  Or "We can still make the Playoffs."  Some of this retarded poo is awful.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting.

Though putting bwood in charge of dealing with trolls would be like putting a 500 lb man with an eating problem in charge of rationing dwindling food supplies in an apocalypse.

I mean, I guess if we needed someone to make racist remarks about nappy heads, and welfare, he'd fit the bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 15 said:

why should I be the minister of trolling?

I'm like a PO officer that used to be a gang member back in the day, but has cleaned up and found jesus and now wants to help kids heading down the wrong path and keep them off the streets. I can sniff a troll job out from a mile away. I can name every single troll on this forum, even the ones that some people may think just be "stupid" or "overreacting". they hate me and would fear my having the power to put an end to their BS.

I have the huddle open and am browsing from 8am-5pm PST every day and randomly throughout the weekend. I've been a member here since the server crash. I want to make the huddle great again and build a fugging wall so high that these kids can't climb over it and clog this beautiful forum with terrible content.

vote for me:

giphy.gif 

3 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

raw

giphy.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 15 said:

why should I be the minister of trolling?

I'm like a PO officer that used to be a gang member back in the day, but has cleaned up and found jesus and now wants to help kids heading down the wrong path and keep them off the streets. I can sniff a troll job out from a mile away. I can name every single troll on this forum, even the ones that some people may think just be "stupid" or "overreacting". they hate me and would fear me having the power to put an end to their BS.

I have the huddle open and am browsing from 8am-5pm PST every day and randomly throughout the weekend. I've been a member here since the server crash. I want to make the huddle great again and build a fugging wall so high that these kids can't climb over it and clog this beautiful forum with terrible content.

vote for me:

giphy.gif 

your from LA and you're a dodger and lakers fan. 

perfect candidate in my eyes! Although given the 3 hour time difference, you'll have to start working at the crack of dawn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...