Fowler article on Bradberry

[Rags]

4 hours ago, Kakarot said:

"Maybe it's because of coach "ibility" or attitude..." 

 

Except that kind of was a problem for Josh his first couple of years here.

 

Remember the Bills game?

[Kakarot]

2 minutes ago, Rags said:

Except that kind of was a problem for Josh his first couple of years here.

 

Remember the Bills game?

When was his attitude ever in question here? He never uttered a word to anyone when he landed in Rivera's doghouse. In fact, you could argue it to great attitude to accept that, and still work your butt off to become the player that he became afterwards

[Rags]

17 minutes ago, Kakarot said:

When was his attitude ever in question here? He never uttered a word to anyone when he landed in Rivera's doghouse. In fact, you could argue it to great attitude to accept that, and still work your butt off to become the player that he became afterwards

Oh yeah he definitely learned his lesson after he was put in Rivera's doghouse.

But if we're comparing where Josh was year one compared to where Bradberry is year one, Josh definitely had an attuide. Not that I minded, but it was there.

[CPantherKing]

9 hours ago, stbugs said:

OK, so Kuechly and TD aren't anchors in pass D?

When you rely on the LBs and DTs to anchor the pass defense, then you end up with a defense like the 2016 Panthers. You could have the 3 best pass coverage LBs and 2 best pass rushing DTs in the NFL. The defense is still going to be bad. Especially with the game on the line in the 4th quarter.

If the LBs and DTs are the anchors of a pass defense, then you have serious problems with the secondary and DEs. LBs and DTs are the run defense anchors. If you expect the secondary and the DEs to be the run D anchors, then you are in serious trouble against the run.

It is really not that hard to understand. If the LBs and DTs have to bail out the secondary and the DEs against the pass in 2017, it will be another long season. Especially with an offense that is built around the running game and has no foundation for a strong passing game to support a weak defense.

[uncfan888]

13 hours ago, Kakarot said:

"Maybe it's because of coach "ibility" or attitude..." 

 

Ehhh. Think you're looking for a reason to complain. They're both black and Josh does have attitude. Rivera is also a minority and there is a reason norman ended up in his doghouse for so long. 

(I put the race stuff in cuz of what electro said and you pieing him.. I hate when people try to make things about race that have nothing to do with race.  There is enough shitty racism in the world.) 

[uncfan888]

9 hours ago, Kakarot said:

When was his attitude ever in question here? He never uttered a word to anyone when he landed in Rivera's doghouse. In fact, you could argue it to great attitude to accept that, and still work your butt off to become the player that he became afterwards

There's more than one type of attitude. And I love Josh.. Not saying there is anything at all wrong with how he plays 

[uncfan888]

1 hour ago, CPantherKing said:

When you rely on the LBs and DTs to anchor the pass defense, then you end up with a defense like the 2016 Panthers. You could have the 3 best pass coverage LBs and 2 best pass rushing DTs in the NFL. The defense is still going to be bad. Especially with the game on the line in the 4th quarter.

If the LBs and DTs are the anchors of a pass defense, then you have serious problems with the secondary and DEs. LBs and DTs are the run defense anchors. If you expect the secondary and the DEs to be the run D anchors, then you are in serious trouble against the run.

It is really not that hard to understand. If the LBs and DTs have to bail out the secondary and the DEs against the pass in 2017, it will be another long season. Especially with an offense that is built around the running game and has no foundation for a strong passing game to support a weak defense.

The man asked you a question. Who do you want drafted? It needs to be on record..  Otherwise you'll spew your nonsense that everyone on here makes fun of you for