Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

KK wants 17 million a year?


Ivan The Awesome

Recommended Posts

With the Falcons and Saints offenses being the way they are, and expected improvement from Tampas offense, we cannot afford for our DLine to get any weaker. You can't go into the season expecting much from Butler, because we saw what happened when we did that with Ealy. You know what you've got with KK. Two years now he's been a top 5 DT. Pay him, as he has earned his top 5 DT money. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lasus83
If you aren't going to pay your draft picks when they perform then you need to acknowledge that their is a "window" and you need to hit it. Otherwise you aren't trying to win championships you're just trying to run a respectable and profitable franchise. 


KK is about to be 30 and we drafted his replacement last year.

Norman was long in the tooth too.

DG paid Cam and Luke... he pays up when players are truly franchise players.

We can do without KK.

Let him play under the tag and then either earn what he will get in FA in 2018 or have a down year and maybe get a 3 year contract from us.

Or, tag n trade... but that'll never happen.

Or, an incentive heavy contract. I vote we give him 1M per sack... paid in arrears. You want 17M, KK? Ok, give us 17 sacks lol

Sent from my SM-G930P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Lasus83 said:


KK is about to be 30 and we drafted his replacement last year.

Norman was long in the tooth too.

DG paid Cam and Luke... he pays up when players are truly franchise players.

We can do without KK.

Let him play under the tag and then either earn what he will get in FA in 2018 or have a down year and maybe get a 3 year contract from us.

Or, tag n trade... but that'll never happen.

Or, an incentive heavy contract. I vote we give him 1M per sack... paid in arrears. You want 17M, KK? Ok, give us 17 sacks lol

Sent from my SM-G930P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

Eventually you have to pay players. Luke and Cam were no brainers, come on he doesn't get credit for that. KK and Norman were top 3 defensive players on a team that almost went undefeated in route to a super bowl appearance. You let Norman walk with the thought being you could retain a guy like KK. If they both walk back to back years, Gettleman should be fired. That would be like Seattle losing Bennett and Sherman in back to back seasons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Lasus83
Eventually you have to pay players. Luke and Cam were no brainers, come on he doesn't get credit for that. KK and Norman were top 3 defensive players on a team that almost went undefeated in route to a super bowl appearance. You let Norman walk with the thought being you could retain a guy like KK. If they both walk back to back years, Gettleman should be fired. That would be like Seattle losing Bennett and Sherman in back to back seasons. 


I will bet you really miss Hurney..

Sent from my SM-G930P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...